City October 1, 2009 11:47 AM

3 County Legislators Support Olmsted Conservancy

3 County Legislators Support Olmsted Conservancy

Erie County Legislature Chair Lynn M. Marinelli, Majority Leader Legislator Maria R. Whyte, and County Legislator Betty Jean Grant are asserting their support for the Olmsted Parks Conservancy in its efforts to maintain the Olmsted Parks in Buffalo, including Cazenovia, Delaware, Front, Martin Luther King Jr., Riverside and South Park, as well as the adjoining parkways, circles.      

Legislature Chair Marinelli said the Olmsted Conservancy has done the parks proud, adding, "The Olmsted Parks also play a role in Erie County regaining its proud standing in the community as well as become an increasingly popular cultural tourism attraction."       

Legislator Whyte made a point of noting that the parks, though enjoyed by locals, have a regional effect. "Erie County residents can use these parks and their offerings for programming, special events and even employment and job training,"  she said.       

"My support of the Olmsted Conservancy, its mission and actual performance are derived in part from the good work I have witnessed at Martin Luther King Jr. Park in my community, and as chair of the Community Enrichment Committee," Legislator Grant said. "The Olmsted Parks give the City of Buffalo and its residents a sense of community, peace and recreation, and we support continuing this."       

The three Democratic legislators were pleased that the Olmsted Parks Conservancy had raised more than $6 million for the operation of the parks, not including the county's matching grant. They agreed that the staff, board and volunteers have achieved major successes in the operation and maintenance of the 1,200-acre Olmsted Park and Parkway System since the intermunicipal agreement was approved in July 2004, and hope for continued success.       

The County Legislature Democratic Majority approved the $360,000 matching grant in the 2009 Erie County budget, and will continue to work with the County Executive to allocate that funding to the Olmsted Parks.

Image: Delaware Park

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

It's too bad that Byron Brown can't see the good that this group has accomplished in such a short period of time. I doubt that the volunteers now working in the parks will stick around if he puts his hands on things, attempting to fill current positions with political appointees.

Why can't there be a slot on the ballot for the November mayoral election that reads "No One" so that the citizens of this city have a real choice and voice in who they want for mayor? If "No One" won, then Brown might see that there is not a majority wanting him to stick around.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Browns only interest in the parks is for the trees. He will cut them down and use the wood to make podiums.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I swear, if Brown screws up the parks too I'm moving. I've seen the libraries cut hours, jobs, talent and companies leave, the school systems worsen, my money dumped into questionable projects, and my voice drown out by the teeming masses of those who are okay with it (if they weren't why could they keep supporting it?). If he screws up the parks I'll take my tax dollars elsewhere.

I don't know how better Buffalonians can stand to get their hearts broken as repeatedly as they do. But I just don't think I can stomach 4 more years of the travesty of this city government. I remember what the parks were like when the conservancy first took over and how far they've come. To even consider taking the parks out of the stewardship of the conservancy shows questionable judgment at best, and a dangerous incompetence in urban planning that will ensure the city stays as is, dying.

I call upon each and every Buffalonian to join me in saying no to the status quo. We are not okay with the lack of quality leadership. We will not have our hard work squandered. Recall Mayor Brown, recall anyone not worth their salt all the way to the top. We make our own destinies. Or perhaps this is all a pipe dream that the city can save itself and we should just jump ship while we still can.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok, Mr. Brown, we are stuck with you for another 4 years (unbelievable as that is).


This affords you the opportunity to redeem yourself, so step up, be a man and do the right thing. Think about someone other than yourself. Choose to do what is right for Buffalo and our people. Take this opportunity to prove you are more than just a smug, arrogant, self-righteous, tyrant who selfishly wants his own way, instead of what is best for our people and city. Set an example for truth and honesty. Become a mayor we want to respect.


Will you do that, Mr. Brown? Will you be honorable and forthright enough to be a positive role-model to your people and city? Will you do everything possible to raise Buffalo up and make us proud? Will you, Mr. Brown? Do you care, at all?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I doubt the sky is falling. Some people are jumping to the conclusion that Byron is seriously considering dropping Olmsted. That seems very unlikely. It would cost too much to replace what Olmsted has been getting done using volunteers and private fundraising.

From the public statements of the mayor and Culter, it sounds like what will happen is some pandering to city union workers and other liberals. Probably he'll just try to get Olmsted to agree to some combination of minor changes like maybe management diversity, living wage, or residency rules - that kind of stuff. Nothing surprising.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hope your right, just wondering what you meant by "pandering to liberals", city government doesn't have much of a record of that as far as I know. I would put city government squarely in the center right conservative camp.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

center right? It's a pretty pro-municipal-union bunch for that characterization, isn't it? Brown doesn't talk about cutting taxes, shrinking municipal staff or overhauling bureaucratic entanglements choking development. He wants to be seen as pro business, true, but his primary function in this regard is to take credit for any business expansion and cast it as a reflection of his administration's efforts, regardless of how inconsequential his office's contributions were.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I suppose not being of the progressive camp would be a better way of describing city government. I just don't see any liberal ideas or initiatives coming out of the city government, they seem stuck in a kind of mediocre center "don't rock the boat" mentality.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It goes to show how left New York is that a liberal progressive Mayor is characterized by "center right" by his own voters. Does that mean Cuomo is a conservate?

I consider myself center right and am labeled a conservate in New York and liberal down south.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Your right Karl, is all about where we are coming from. I make no claim of being a centrist and I am comfortable being labeled far left. Many of those on the far right seem to not be as accepting of their own place and truly believe they are mainstream.

replied to KarlMalone
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BRLifer, when I wrote "pandering to city union workers and other liberals", I meant groups who advocate the left-leaning issues mentioned by Brown and his spokesman this week about Olmsted: for example, management diversity, living wage, and residency rules.

http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/story/808785.html

Brown: '... "My administration intends to bring labor representatives and other relevant stakeholders to the negotiating table," the mayor wrote. He also said only two of the conservancy's 14 senior managers live in the city, while 55 percent of the administrative staff live outside Buffalo. ...'

Cutler: '...Peter K. Cutler, the mayor's chief spokesman, ...said the mayor has questions about some of the conservancy's hiring practices ... "All the issues will be brought to the table, including the job they have done in managing the parks, and the mayor's concerns about diversity in the workplace, paying employees a living wage and residency," Cutler said. ...'

Those statements sound to me like left-leaning pandering.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

OK, I see your point but how is residency a "left" issue? Almost all of our suburban neighbors require residency for Teachers, Police, Fireman, etc. Does this mean these governments lean left?

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The residency issue is pure hog wash. It makes no sense to say the parks are a county asset used by people from outside of the city, then turn around 5 years later with a new administration and say "But" the workers should be city residents. It's Brown's only way of pulling the rug out - and handing out patronage jobs, while inviting the union in.

The parks will not only suffer, but cost taxpayers more - to do less.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wasn't advocating for Brown to control the parks but residency is an issue that is defended when used by the suburbs and condemned when suggested for the city. The same old argument of limiting the pool of qualified applicants is made but this doesn't seem to be an issue in the suburbs where residency requirements are the norm.

replied to Chenango
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BRLifer, on that issue, yes I think any town govt residency rules are acting in a leftist way in which their employees are unjustifiably bossed around in their personal lives for a supposed collective greater good.

A more freedom-based approach would be to choose and retain employees who have the best objective qualifications directly related to their jobs, and in non-work hours let them live wherever they choose to live.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I pretty much agree in principle, we shouldn't force people to live in a particular place as a condition of employment. I don't agree it is a leftist approach, to me it is a right leaning attempt at control.
My issue is about how it is accepted as a given in the suburbs and rejected as outrageous and unfair when attempted in the city. It is just another example of the unequal playing field that always seems to leave Buffalo at a disadvantage.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Residency rules should be outlawed statewide. That won't happen so the next best thing is to have as few of them as possible.

In this case it sounds ridiculous for Brown to complain about Olmsted management not having enough city residents - but no more ridiculous than other residency rules put in place by the Common Council and Board of Ed (and town boards too as you point out).

Controls against individual freedom are hardly limited to right-leaning govts as you imply. There's plenty of examples of leftists doing that too. There's obvioulsy different flavors of both left and right.

Since the other 2 of 3 issues the mayor raised about Olmsted (management diversity and living wage) are clearly left-leaning, it's more consitent to interpret the residency issue that way too and consider his pandering about Olmsted to be left-leaning as a whole.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Although the Olmsted Parks lie in the city, they are a county asset - if not a regional. The idea of the mayor coming along and breaking something up that actually works in this city, seems criminal to me.

And it's not like he has new ideas - he simply wants it to build his base through patronage jobs and throwing a bone to the union. In other words, less effort for more money, at an additional cost to the taxpayers. Now that's leadership !!!

Stop this madness. Sign the petition:
http://www.petitiononline.com/BOPC/petition.html

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll