City August 21, 2009 11:00 AM

Michael Gainer: Fired from Buffalo ReUse

Michael Gainer: Fired from Buffalo ReUse

Early this week, Michael Gainer of Buffalo ReUse was fired by interim Executive Director Harvey Garrett.  Garrett was brought on board to replace Gainer in that position some months ago, and Gainer was consequently made COO.

The firing has sent a shockwave through the community--those who recognize Gainer as a hero on an ailing East Side and its residents, as well as those who've been fans of the turn-around Garrett has made in West Side communities and beyond. 

Paul Hogan of the Oshei Foundation, one of the benefactors for Buffalo ReUse who helped to put Garrett in place, hasn't returned our call concerning the firing, and Garrett's phone call to us was filled with off-the-record statements.  While the exact reason for the firing goes largely unanswered, Gainer is left to indict himself, as he struggles to understand exactly what went wrong.  He's made mistakes he says, but he also says that most of what he's done is right.

Monday night, the house came down on Gainer, and the ill winds that blew it there have far more to do with a board that doesn't fully buy into Gainer's methods than the "Clash of the Rock Star Community Activists" many think this is. Some point to a clash of egos.  But while Gainer recognizes himself as not being above reproach, a person who's worked with Garrett outside of Buffalo ReUse describes him as "a one man band, and a pretty loud one."

Add to that a membership that is devoted to Gainer and his unconventional ways, while understanding that a deeper set of checks and balances is needed, and it's obvious that a change is coming.  It seems unlikely that when the dust settles all of the main characters will still be in place, but more importantly, there is a question of whether Gainer, a nationally recognized innovator, will be able to carry out the mission of Buffalo ReUse.

The official board release is as follows: 

As no doubt you already know, Michael Gainer, one of our founding members, is no longer employed by Buffalo ReUse.  Buffalo ReUse will forever be indebted to Michael for his vision, passion and drive, without which Buffalo ReUse would not exist today.  The decision to part ways with Michael was the most difficult our young organization has faced, and we assure you it was absolutely our last resort.  As the statement released by Michael indicates "lots" of "mistakes" were made, protocols were not followed and the chain of command was not respected.  These infractions have created significant barriers to the organization, its sustainability and its future growth.  Like all not for profit entities, Buffalo ReUse--and everyone associated with it--must, above all else, follow clearly defined regulations and protocol for its business matters. Unfortunately, a cross-roads has been reach with Michael regarding these matters and accordingly a change had to be made.

We wish Michael the best in his future professional endeavors.

Some background: ReUse Buffalo is known to everyone as an entity that does the gritty, green work of reusing building materials acquired in their demolition of abandoned housing around the city, something we have an ample supply of, hence the name ReUse.

Thought of another way, the way that was intended by Founder Michael Gainer when he segued off of his prior endeavor, Youth Corps, ReUse doesn't refer to inanimate objects at all.  Sure, the $6-$8,000 that ReUse nets per week during the busy season "in our little ghetto store on the East Side," as Gainer says drolly, is something to show for the tangible harvested and sold goods that are then reused. 

ReUse is defined in the youth and under skilled unemployed Gainer works with and trains with a purpose, out of school kids and repentant adults who need the second chance and the tools that will put them in a position of job readiness.  The housing materials are simply a byproduct of this mission of recycling lives to be self-sustaining that Gainer has embarked on. 

"[ReUse] isn't an accident," Gainer says. "We're on the East Side because that's where the out of school people are that need employment. But our philosophies, our beliefs, and our methods are all thought of as risky."  According to Gainer, the answer to risk is coming up with alternate, innovative and sometimes risky solutions.  "We don't fire people, we work with them and help them.  We don't drug-test.  If we're true to our mission, we qualify a "risk" by saying, 'Do you want to learn?  Do you want to improve your life?'  If the answer is yes, you're hired."  Gainer is still working at ReUse on a volunteer basis.

Membership spokesman, Chris Smith of Western New York Media says, "If we have a mother of five who's a crack smoker and we don't give her a chance, those five kids lose too."

Meanwhile, there's a strong membership behind Gainer--and they're doing their best to grapple with what's right on paper and what's right for the cause. Emails have been circulated and meetings have been called.  According to Smith, last night's membership meeting looked at ways to keep Gainer and open communications.

Gainer has a dedicated following who believes in what he's doing, conventionally or not, but what concerns him right now is how he's going to keep fulfilling the same mission he's had since day one at ReUse.

"I made mistakes," Gainer says. "I took loans without board approval to meet salaries and vendor costs, but I always knew when I had more coming in to replace it."  When money was late coming from the state, Gainer says he was told to let people go.  The thought was repugnant to him and counterintuitive in this endeavor that was built to employ, so everyone took pay cuts, and Gainer borrowed.

There was no model for what Gainer has implemented with ReUse, or the best way to run it.  The New York Times didn't cover him and ReUse because this was a project like so many others.  No one has really done what Gainer has, and his wish was to do it with no grants, no loans--he saw a self-sustaining organization.  If it had stayed that way, there wouldn't be an issue with bookkeeping, but it might not have gotten so far, so fast.

"With foundation money comes accountability down to the penny," Smith says.  "The membership's primary focus is to understand what's happening and find organizational direction while still representing the original founding vision."

Though he says the membership may not have a full picture yet of who Garrett is and where he wants the organization to go, he says that the significant issue at play is that there may be two directions here, Gainer's and Garrett's.  "They may both be trying to do the same thing," Smith notes," "but they might differ in vision and core values."

Smith says the membership has the ability to ask for the resignation of the board, a board that picks a slate of candidates for the members to vote on, but he's not sure that will happen.

"Buffalo ReUse is bigger than Michael--it can't reside in the fate of one guy," Smith says, "but his thrust needs to stay intact.  The board wants him to stay in some capacity.  He needs to be involved."

For his part, Garrett's on-the-record statement included saying that he's not sure he could have done what Gainer has. He seems to respect the unconventional and inspired ways Gainer has fulfilled his mission, in what Smith refers to as "a strangled and forgotten community." 

Gainer, for his part, feels he could have gotten better backup in the fiduciary aspect of running ReUse.  Clearly, his hands are not made to shuffle papers, but the help that came, just recently, was late enough for Gainer to have had to find alternatives to what he says was foot dragging on the part of the board.  "I did what I needed to get by," Gainer says. "No one came to me and asked me what I needed."

Of his ouster, Gainer says, "If it goes down this road, I'll start a rehab company. I've got 500 ideas in my back pocket, and this was just one of them that came out of Youth Corps.  We'll emerge again and stick to the higher priority of job readiness.  It's a much better possibility when you have the tools to do good in the world."

And Gainer says it all fits together, but not always at once.  The only sign of bitterness Gainer shows involves the last thing Garrett said to him when he was fired, one hour before Gainer and his business partner Kevin Hayes were going to file a grievance against Garrett.  According to Gainer, Garrett said, "It's obvious you can't work here anymore.  You just don't care."

Smith says the annual meeting is coming up on September 22nd, but that 10 percent of the membership can ask for a special meeting prior to that with 10 days notice.  He imagines that it will happen soon, but stresses this isn't about infighting, but rather a strategic strength of the parties involved.  "We're hoping to establish better communication," Smith says.  Let's hope they get some clear answers for themselves, Gainer and all of the people on the East Side who depend on him.

See Western New York Media for more on Gainer and a video in which he talks about the firing.

 

Image: New York Times

 

View image

5 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.buffalorising.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4328

Oishei Foundation President Robert Gioia issued a statement today about the firing of Michael Gainer as COO of Buffalo ReUse.  While the statement makes no specific allegations about Gainer's mismanagement at Buffalo ReUse, it does point to organ... Read More

When we last spoke to Oishei Foundation Executive Director Robert Gioia, he had just issued a statement concerning the firing of Michael Gainer from Buffalo ReUse. Without specific charges, Gioia said that Gainer had put Buffalo ReUse in organiza... Read More

It's safe to say that Buffalo ReUse (BRU) is an entity that has seen its share of upheavals in recent weeks.As a result, benefactors of BRU, the John R. Oishei Foundation, have taken some heat concerning the origins of a building at 635 South Park bein... Read More

At its annual meeting October 7, the members of Buffalo ReUse elected a Board of Directors to lead the organization through the next phase of its growth. Newly elected members are Vincent Kuntz, Keith James, Alison Mueller, David Laguerre and Daniel A... Read More

Effective yesterday, October 19th, Michael Gainer was offered and has accepted the position of program director for Buffalo ReUse, the not-for-profit agency he founded.   The responsibilities of the position were agreed on by the board of directo... Read More

Comments

Leave a comment

wow...this is a little heavy handed! fired!? are you kidding? This guy created an institution, something we should all be collectivley proud of! Now I have now idea what has been happening behind closed doors,and wouldn't even want to speculate, but this is outcome is outrageous! The board should be ashamed of themselves for canning their....wait for it ...founder of a grass-roots inner city, salvage shop... not a fortune 500 company. Their is no "Brand-Name" without the passion and purpose.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This whole situation is reminiscent of the power struggle that took place in SABAH many years back. At the time we all thought that it was the end of the organization, but it turned out to be a blessing for all involved. I volunteered with ReUse a couple years ago when they were first starting out, and it was obvious that things were done only one way. Michael surrounded himself with very devoted, but unorganized, sycophants who deeply believed in Michael. They turned off many volunteers and were relatively closed to suggestions from those who are "just the volunteers".


I hope the organization keeps going and builds momentum as it moves forward. This is one of the most difficult situations for any organization, especially one whose image is so closely tied to one person. When that one person has to leave, the organization must work quickly to reposition itself, clarify the mission, and communicate to the volunteers. It looks like they are in good hands with Harvey Garrett. Best of luck to all of you.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The organization is very likely to emerge stronger, but that doesn't imply that Gainer must leave. There is no substitute for the type of energy, creativity and vision that someone like Michael Gainer provides. Young and immature organizations that grow rapidly and inevitably structure themselves in an incomplete fashion that does not always play to the strengths of their assets.

I, for one, hope that a month from now, I'll be witnessing terrific programs from Buffalo ReUse led by Michael Gainer with the support of a sophisticated and supportive board.

replied to O'Brien
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No doubt. Maybe this will give Gainer's ego the wake-up call that he needs. Maybe this move will make the organization stronger and will validate or clarify the mission of ReUse to the point that they can accommodate Gainer again. I have met Michael on numerous occasions and truly respect his vision and enthusiasm, but that doesn't make him any easier to work with. This type of overthrow takes place a lot in start-up companies and non-profits, and usually is done as a last resort. I have no doubt, and have it on good authority, that this was the case here. I look forward to continuing to volunteer with ReUse and will continue to shop the ReStore as long as it remains open. Best of luck to Harvey and the rest of the ReUse team. I know that some of you are faced with more difficult decisions.

replied to Robert Franke
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The ReStore is the Habitat for Humanity retail space on Amherst street. Buffalo ReUse's store is called the ReSOURCE.

replied to O'Brien
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I heard rumblings of Gainer's dismissal long before Garrett came on the scene. He was running around making financial commitments without Board approval. There is a certain protocol when handling financing which needs to be followed. An unfortunate situation to say the least but not out of the ordinary operations.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

From the article it seems that he was putting BR at financial risk.
"I took loans without board approval to meet salaries and vendor costs, but I always knew when I had more coming in to replace it." When money was late coming from the state, Gainer says he was told to let people go. The thought was repugnant to him and counterintuitive in this endeavor that was built to employ, so everyone took pay cuts, and Gainer borrowed.
Was Gainer the President? or the leader who decided what decisions were going to be made? If not I can understand where the board is coming from. For the security of the organization you have to be financially sound and continually taking risks and ignoring the input of the board sounds like a risk for BR. It sounds like the board did what they believed was necessary to secure the organization. I personally think people are putting to much emotionally attachment to Garrett and Gainer. This was a organization that helps impoverished areas of the city; to improve the area and its people. It is not the I love Gainer or I love Garrett fan clubs. People need to look at this as either having an organization that is around or one that was risking its financial stability and could have failed. If the latter happened everyone loses.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is the reason that not for profits are required to have a board of directors. It is too easy for one person to abuse their responsibilities and overstep their boundaries, all in the name of what they feel to be right. Gainer broke the rules, just like Worldcomm and Enron to a much smaller degree, and he needs to go. Left unchecked, this could have gotten really ugly, and who knows this may be a sacrifice by the current board to avoid a more thorough investigation.

replied to jolopy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If the problem is financial management, the E.D. (Garrett) is responsible and should be fired. Open up the books and get to the bottom of the mess.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Perhaps the financial mismanagement precedes the appointment of Harvey. Perhaps the financial mismanagement is what precipitated Michael's demotion and Harvey's appointment. Perhaps the ED responsible for the financial irregularities (Michael) is correctly being help responsible.

replied to Roy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Didn't Garrett just go through nearly the same thing in November when he was ousted from the West Side Neighborhood Housing Service?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Michael started Buffalo ReUse with a big idea and a big personality to match. However, even the most beautiful and creative ideas in the context of a non-profit organization need some structure in order to maintain legal compliance and foster sustainability. A true leader will not allow his own ego to take precedence over the mission of the organization, nor will he position himself to be a "savior" to the community, but will be willing to quietly and skillfully lead and do what is right- which is not always sexy and anti-establishment. Corruption can exist in community based organizations the same way they can exist in corporate America. From what I have gathered about this situation, the Buffalo ReUse Board acted to preserve the mission of Buffalo ReUse, and prevent the organization's funding and tax-exempt status from being lost due to mismanagement of funds. I know the Board President of Buffalo ReUse to be a truly excellent person who has the courage to make hard decisions to get things done, and who has the ability to balance heart and soul with good business practice. I think Harvey also has an understanding of how to meld community development with smart management. Good luck to Michael in finding a position that plays to his strengths, and to Buffalo ReUse in building and growing the important role that they are positioned play in Buffalo.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Unless I'm missing something the appropriate response would have been to hire a financial manager when it became clear that one was needed. Where was the negligence when it comes to green demolition, community development and leadership? Leaders aren't financial managers or laywers. They're the ones with the vision and the charisma and the wherewithal to make stuff happen. On those accounts, Michael is clearly a leader. And since effective leaders a so few and far between it was a grave mistake to fire him from the organization that he gave legs and inspired.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Excellent response, Dash! I firmly believe the direction of the Board and/or the Executive Director would have been to acquire either a CPA to oversee the books or an on-site staffer/CFO rather than boot out Michael. That would show total responsibility to not only the beans but to the community being served.

replied to dash
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The way to show total responsibility to the community is to focus on the overall sustainability of the organization and the mission. The ReUse mission remains the same.
Michael, as an indivdual, is fallible and, seemingly, he failed. It is not the board's responsibility to ensures Michael's continued employment, but the continued success of the agency.
As it seems that you are more concerned with Michael's welfare than that of Buffalo ReUse, I invite you to contact him and begin the process of developing a new non-profit. I believe he is available...
Finding funding streams, however, might be difficult to obtain as community organizations will be wary of his past improprieties. Perhaps this is a reason as to why Buffalo ReUse felt more comfortable moving into the future without Michael.

The mission , the community and this city are all more important than an individual. Less focus on the trees, it's time to see the forest whole.

replied to MRodgers
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@Build_it_to_the_Curb!

One can argue that the sustainability of the organization and the mission of ReUse goes hand in hand with the involvement of Gainer.

Like it or not, Gainer brings a national presence to the organization. The Board gave up the equity that Gainer created in name recognition by choice. That is a poor move IMO.

But as Steel pointed out on FixBuffalo yesterday - "Don't beg to use the big boys toys if you don't want them setting the rules. Pretty simple life policy to follow."

While it is a pretty straight forward policy, it is funny that David Steel of all people is the one who points it out. After all, he has no problem telling people how they should spend their money or what rules they should live by when the result goes against his vision of development.

Anyways, the best solution and one that should have happened, is what MJ suggested.

That being Gainer was removed from the day to day fiscal operation of ReUse and a CPA/CFO was brought in to manage the money. IMO that is what should have happened is all involved wanted ReUse to be sustainable.

However, what this would have left was Gainer being the face of ReUse. He would still be invited to speak at conferences like the recent on in Dayton and he would still have his face and story in the New York Times. Not the ideal situation if you are someone in the top ring who wants to build your own brand equity, speak at these conferences and have your "story" in the times.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If the sustainability of ReUse goes hand in hand with Michael's presence, then he has failed to create a true community organization. I don't believe this to be the case. Michael saw a need within the community and began developing the type of organization to fill this need. The need still exists, therefore, the organization is still relevant.
The idea was, is and will continue to be more important than Michael. Otherwise, ReUse is little more than a cult of personality.

replied to Really?
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@Build_it_to_the_Curb!

It is obvious you missed my point. Ideas and inspiration is a proven commodity. Implementation is not. The what is being presented as the downside of Gainer is implementation.

My point was, the problems that are being presented, and the reasons for his termination, are all correctable issues. However, for the board to cut loose ideas and inspiration for the sake of implementation is rather short sighted. This is a perfect example of "Cutting off the nose to spite the face" if you ask me.

My question to you is have you ever worked for a start-up? Either in the public or non-profit sector, because it really does not matter. These types of problems happen. These types of challenges are expected. At least by those who know what they are doing. Nothing in any bio of Michael Gainer claims he is a money person. He is a carpenter, educator and leader. He has shown that he can take an idea and inspire OTHERS to follow him. This is NOT an easy task.

As someone who has worked for several web start-ups, it is common for a person to have an idea, ability to code and get a small amount of people to see a vision. This is able to launch phase one. When money comes in, those handing out the money know what the value is. It is the person who is rare enough to have vision and able to make others see and believe it. They also know that these types of people are never short on ideas or somehow lose the ability to make others see. They invest in THAT and fill in the rest.

In this case, it appears to me that those "investing" in ReUse think that they have the ability to provide the same ideas, inspiration and leadership as Michael Gainer. Only time will tell. But I know where I would lay my bet.

While the need may still exist, the organizations relevance is 100% based on where it is going, not where it has been. Sustainability is not just one idea but several in sequence. While there are many bright and talented people behind ReUse, they were BEHIND ReUse. They were never leading the pack. There are many reasons for this.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Really?

I think you missed the point of his firing. From what I have read and gathered (admittedly from the interwebs, so I try to take it with a grain of salt) is not that Michael wasn't a numbers man, but that there were serious issues of financial impropriety. While he may be an "ideas man", as the head of the organization he still needed to be a "numbers man". When it became clear that he wasn't and it was adversely affecting the future functioning of ReUse, he was reassigned and someone who was obstensibly better with numbers was brought aboard. (Which is exactly what M. Rodgers would like to see happen) Even after this occurred, the ReUse board and Michael's direct supervisors seemingly agreed that, inspite of removing Michael from financial responsibility, his actions continued to affect the proper functioning of the organization and needed to be addressed. Not knowing the full extent of the actions on either side, I cannot approve or disapprove of either side.
What I do take exception to the the belief that Michael is ReUse. ReUse (it's members, staff, volunteers, board members and community at large) IS ReUse. No single person is greater than the whole in a community organization. I, and the people I know who support the ReUse mission, did not get involved because we looked deep into Michael's eyes and swooned. We got involved because we believed that tis was a unique and viable solution to a few problems that plague Buffalo. This has not changed. Buffalo is a city in need of ideas and solutions and ReUse can continue in that vein.
Finally, yes, I have been involved with start-up ventures. 2, in fact. A for-profit business that my friends and I ran during college that we folded after graduation and a not-for-profit that I worked at almost immediately after graduation. I spent a year working for this 2 month old organization building its financial capacity so it could continue with its mission after its grant funding ran out. I am pleased to say that this non-profit still exists and is doing quite well.
The key to success, I believe, in ANY organization is to de-emphasis the individual and promote the organization. Peter Senge refers to this thinking as "the fifth discipline," and its aims are to create a learning organization, that is, an organization that takes the strengths of the individual and institutionalizes them for the benefit of the entire organizational structure. Should ReUse fail to adapt without Michael, then a large portion of the blame should lie with Michael himself for creating an organization that was so dependent on a single person and not oriented to the community at large.

replied to Really?
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"That being Gainer was removed from the day to day fiscal operation of ReUse and a CPA/CFO was brought in to manage the money. IMO that is what should have happened is all involved wanted ReUse to be sustainable."

Simply stated - that's what the first step should have been before canning the guy. Step-by-step, folks. Hatchet jobs sometimes lob off the very fingers of those wielding the axe.

replied to Really?
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would think it a normal response for a board to recommend this type of action. There must be more to the story which has not been told. My guess is he showed total disregard to the board and they felt the need to take such action. I just hope he stays in Buff

replied to MRodgers
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Gainer acknowledges in an email that a financial person had already stabilized their systems. So that wasn't the answer.


You can't have officers borrowing money without approval. He may be a great idea guy, but you have to act responsibly with donor money. Too bad he was in a position to make such a mistake.


See Gainer's email published at http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2009/08/michael-gainer-out-at-buffalo-reuse/

replied to dash
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is critically important that there be more public information about what is happening at Bflo ReUse, one of the most successful ‘grassroots’ endeavours effectively addressing poverty I have ever seen in Bflo.

Mike Gainer has been truly ‘charismatic’, recruiting a very energetic group of volunteers very quickly, while making a major impact in overcoming longtime hopelessness on the eastside.

My concern is the relationship between Harvey Garrett’s hiring & Gainer’s firing.

I have known Garrett far too well & rate him one of the major reasons I left Bflo. I found him to be highly skilled in a number of areas, but equally unscrupled.

He was a major cause of the firing of urban planner Jill Lemke, who left the security of a city job to found the West Side Collaborative, which Garrett quickly took over, but never moved into an organized endeavour beyond the power of his personality & endless energy.

Lemke left the city in despair, describing Garrett as the most manipulative person she had ever met.

I too was on the receiving end of Garrett’s ‘power’ strategy. After endless prosecutions for exposing city hall misconduct, I fully expected that my next prosecution would be for exposing the misconduct of notorious flipper & alleged “lawyer” Ray Osland. Osland moved to Bflo & became a very close friend & “partner” of Garrett after flipping Bflo houses on eBay from Connecticut, along with corrupt local realtor Colleen Sardella.

Garrett, a laison to Housing Court, took Osland's girlfriend-partner to a HUD meeting on flipping, introducing her as the 'wife' of a 'responsible investor.

Osland, obviously a sociopath, & Amanda Carter, secretly moved to S Bflo then disappeared from Bflo.

Garrett also strongly supported WSNHS Exec Linda Chiarenza in taking me to court for protesting inaction in the dramatic Joanne McGrath matter in my old neighborhood. She is currently again in the news for animal cruelty, as she came back nightly to foreclosed 84 Manchester with paper plates of catfood, after walking from $60K of HUD-insured & WSNHS loans to live mortgage-free at 20 Arkansas where, she has just been arrested for animal cruelty.

I took paper plate #100 of catfood, attracting rats, to WSNHS seeking help at the property I had maintained for a year. Mr Garrett changed the catfood to cat****, altho he had utterly no knowledge of the matter.

Garret & Chiarenza had a high profile split last November, when Garret was unceremoniously ousted from the WSNHS Board.

Garrett in undeniably a good finanacial manager, having lived on his own investments for about 12 years & has endlessly worked to change the image of his WS neighborhood. Puzzlingly, while getting endless attention for rehabbing his house on Richmond, the exterior painting is still unfinished after 12 years of ownership, raising questions about how effective he is at “getting the job done”...

However, he demands to be the center of attention, while having little interest in addressing poverty, a major mission of Bflo ReUse.

The combination of Garrett & Gainer mave have been a tragic mistake by the board.

We need more information about facts behind the scenes, so that another invaluable activist, & the effective organization he founded, is not lost in Bflo’s longtime losing battle against poverty & blight.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Didn't you post this somewhere else? Copy and paste your rants elsewhere. Your only looking for someone to argue with. Also, I did drive by Harvey's house on Richmond and it looks great. Maybe you should fly back to Buffalo and take a look.

Now I wait for your typically response to state my full name and not to hide behind "Jolopy" as you so typically do. I wouldn't give you my full name bc to me you are the type of person that would search for me and look in my windows.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whoooooooo Caaaaaaaarrrrrreeessss? People get fired all the time, it's a fact of life, and for many people, it's a blessing. I don't know why everyone is so bent out of shape, I mean here's a good lesson:

Steve Jobs was fired from Apple, the company he created in his garage! He moved on, developed a new operating system called NEXTstep, and then wound up being hired back to head Apple during its darkest days, on the brink of bankruptcy. The "hiatus" allowed him to pursue his passion without being encumbered by the day-to-day workings of the organization, and allowed him to be a better leader when he returned. Undoubtedly, Apple would not be what it is today without his leadership... or his absence.

Maybe that will be what happens here, and maybe not. Maybe Mr. Gainer will work to develop something new and exciting and interesting, while Buffalo ReUse continues to grow and develop.

Stop thinking so provincially, and start thinking about the long-term big picture.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What makes this whole episode particularly outrageous is that the entirety of the ReUse membership, it's staff and the community surrounding it follow and support Michael Gainer wholeheartedly. He is the leader regardless of this episode and will be followed regardless of the outcome of these events. Anyone who questions this need only walk around the community near ReUse on the east side and talk to people. I'm there every day and I see it clearly and unequivocally.

ReUse has grown very rapidly and must manage the same challenges any other fast growing organization will face. What ReUse needs in order to meet these challenges is for it's leader and the organization to be supported by its Board of Directors. Instead, they've managed to throw out the visionary and demoralize it's members as well as the community.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"What makes this whole episode particularly outrageous is that the entirety of the ReUse membership, it's staff and the community surrounding it follow and support Michael Gainer wholeheartedly."
-You are wrong...some of us support the organization wholeheartedly and will continue to do so. Please speak for yourself and not 'the entirety of ReUse Membership."

replied to dash
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was wrong. I am only aware of a large majority of membership who support Michael. Regarding the community that surrounds ReUse I am very much a part of it and I'm not aware of a single resident within three or four blocks that wouldn't support him.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fair enough...I live on the west side and cannot speak to the east side community where ReUse does its work (or at least physically exists as its work encompasses all of Buffalo and WNY). I hope for the best for ReUse and urge everyone, regardless of how they interpret this incident, to continue supporting ReUse because ReUse is not Michael, it is its idea, its mission and its members.

That said, I do like Michael, support him and wish him the best in the future. And I hope he stays in Buffalo.

replied to dash
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

One thing I hate about anonymous blogs is that I never know to whom I am responding.

Mr. Build_it_to_the_Curb (sounds like a Monty Python skit) has made consistently rational and commonsense comments, but the fact is that at this stage in its evolution, Buffalo ReUse is still very much the manifestation of Mr. Gainer's vision and drive. If we hope to have the organization develop into an institution of real and lasting value, Mr. Gainer's role is far from over.

Were discussion and mutual agreement enough to morph magically into action and accomplishment, we'd have little need for the likes of Mr. Gainer. As it is, we are sorely lacking in his particular brand of leadership. Making a too hasty transition from vision to institution can only compromise the organization's mission and that's the point we find ourselves at now.

What Buffalo ReUse most needs is a board that is ready, willing and able to channel Mr. Gainer's special talents into a positive and self-sustaining result. Being a member of a not-for-profit Board of Directors is an unheralded and thankless job that is best left to those without hungry egos. A good director must be capable of deriving sufficient satisfaction from the unacknowledged act of contributing to the common good.

The organization also needs funders that are flexible and don't see themselves as the social equivalent of venture capitalists. This is an organization that has a lot of growing to do. It's not ready to be shaped like topiary.

No matter what happens, I hope all interested parties will understand what they have in Mr. Gainer and Buffalo ReUse. We may be willing to be content with low expectations in our municipal government. Let's give free reign to the grand ambitions and marvelous creativity that spring from our community roots.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bob,

Anonymity is the rule of the game, I just use it to my full advantage. The name is a just a reference to Buffalo Risings most frequent complaint. Monty Python wouldn't have to reach far to find humor in the ridiculous tone this website sometimes(frequently?) achieves.

I agree that ReUse, in its current state, is very much the manifestation of Michael's vision and drive, but ReUse can develop into an institution of real and lasting value without Michael. Not my preferred outcome, but what we can achieve beginning today.

I disagree that what ReUse needs most right now is a board who supports Michael wholeheartedly. Not knowing the cause of his firing, but in light of his admission of 'mistakes', I feel it is reasonable for the board to demand some accountability. What ReUse needs right now is for the community to step up and volunteer, because the idea is good and the organization worthwhile. In the third poorest city in the US, where industry has left and government is shown to more corrupt literally everyday, are we really going to give up this?

The Chinese use the same symbol for crisis and opportunity, are we really going to let this crisitunity pass us by?

I'll message you next time I am headed to a ReUse volunteer event. Then you'll be able to put a face to the anonymous internet handle. Have a good day and keep up your good work on the west side.

replied to Robert Franke
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This reminds me of Shea's Buffalo, about 30 years ago: once the hardest part of saving Shea's was done, the founder and "visionary" of the effort was booted out & replaced with "professionals".

It's why I avoid all grassroots-type organizations; too often, they turn into ego-wars and power-grabs.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As always in this country, politics prevails and proves to tear down even the most noble causes. I am absolutely disgusted by the news I have been reading, and hearing first-hand, about the actions of the Board and Harvey Garrett. Harvey is a power-hungry activist who cares more about advancing his own name than the so-called causes he champions. It seems his goal is to come in and take over every organization he begins to work with. He should never have been brought into Buffalo ReUse in the first place. This can all be attributed to a Board that is extremely out of touch with the daily working of the organization. Decisions are made based on how they look on paper, and not the impact they carry with them. This whole episode only diminishes my hope for this city. Where do we go from here?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What Elena said here gets to the heart of the matter:

"There was no model for what Gainer has implemented with ReUse, or the best way to run it. The New York Times didn't cover him and ReUse because this was a project like so many others."

I checked Amazon. There's no "Non-profit house deconstruction for dummies" manual that Gainer forgot to read.

It seems like the board basks in the image of being hip, pioneering, and innovative but internally expects the organization to be as mechanical as a quota-driven production line. You can't have it both ways.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That's the problem with organizations like this. When they become successful, there is this inexorable drive to corporatize everything about them and turn what were once unique, renegade idealists into corporate gerbils. They'll end up firing Garrett too and then replace him with a salaried fat jellyfish in a suit. I just hope Gainer doesn't get discouraged and flee to Portland.

replied to Shoestring Budget
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Both you and Elena need to spend more time doing research and less time thinking of clever retorts that you think prove your point.

There might not be a "For Dummies Guide to Hybrid Demolition," but there is a consulting firm:

http://reuseconsulting.com/Home_Page.php

and look who they advise:

http://artvoice.com/issues/v6n29/bringing_down_the_house

Being hip, pioneering and innovative doesn't mean anything if you can't balance your books. That's other people's money he was playing with and it comes with accountability.

replied to Shoestring Budget
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That's why you hire a CFO or financial manager. In no other enterprise are the ED and the CFO expected to be the same person. The board failed to supply this key expertise and scapegoated Gainer for the result.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Shoe: Again, Gainer acknowledges that a financial manager had been hired and had stablized the systems. See Gainer's email http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2009/08/michael-gainer-out-at-buffalo-reuse/ .

Financial processes only work if your officers, e.g. Gainer, play like adults and don't take out loans without approval, as he admits he did. Look up the term fiduciary responsibility.

Reading "I took loans without board approval..." stood my hair on end. It's his epitaph at BAR, no matter their reasons for firing him.

Chief Evangelist would have been a better role for the man.

replied to Shoestring Budget
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sheas is extremely successful today!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Shea's Buffalo Theater is successful because it wasn't ripped down for a parking lot, which was prevented only by a few dedicated 'nutcases' who had no hope of success, at the time.

No other downtown theater had such help, and all of them are dust now. Maybe ReUse will follow the same course & be successful with the support of government and foundations - or maybe not.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What is the current status & organizational structure at West Side Community Collaborative, where Harvey pulled a 'coup', expelling urban planner / founder Jill Lemke, who left town in despair.

What is the WSCC mission, budget & board structure? Did Lemke's pinful departure enhance the development of a new idea?

That organization has been under Garrett's sole leadership for over 5 years & might predict the future of ReUse under Garrett's leadership.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I must say that I've never heard of the WSCC, before this moment! They can't be doing anything for those of us who live on the West Side. Probably doing for themselves, as do most of these self-serving wastes of time and cash. (Should I be bold and suggest that WSCC is another friends & family employment agency, sucking-up Block Grant funds? Most of these wastes ARE just that, even if this one might not be. )

replied to Dick Kern
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Verdan"

I am very troubled that nobody is talking about WSCC, where the "elimination" of urban planner Jill Lemke by Harvey Garrett(HG) appears to closely follow the current 'elimination' of Mike Gainer at ReUse.

'Verdan's' concern about "sucking up blockgrant funds" is not a significant issue at WSCC, so far as I know.

Indeed the opposite appears to be true. HG has repeatedly urged that no government funds be used to save WS neighborhoods. However, that results in a "negative subsidy" to impoverished WS areas, as $10's & $100's of millions of govt developer-driven "anti-poverty funds" sweep thru the city, recruiting folks out of the WS into newbuild 'poverty housing' elsewhere in the city costing as much as $1/4 million each . . in a shrinking city having about 30,000 housing vacancies.

What is the current status of WSCC?

There must be BfloRising readers who know if WSCC is doing very well under HG's sole leadership, or not. It is a good predictor of ReUse's future under Garrett's leadership.

Why the silence on such an important issue?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What have you done for the West side if you don't mind me asking?

replied to Dick Kern
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Bflo ReUse website is dark on the issue. Very odd isn't it that they have such a professional website while apparently little financial expertise?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have donated much time and effort and material to ReUse. Gainer has made ReUse happen. The staff has gone above and beyond to make things work. I have seen them go from a ratty little lumber yard to a packed store in a year.

To fire him shows extreme misguidance on the side of the board. ReUse doesnt need new vision. From what I hear they may need a hardlining manager but shouldnt the board be that group of hardlining managers? I do not know much about how ReUse was funded or how its board operates. It just seems to me like they cut off their nose to spite their face. They are not dealing from a strong position and I predict they will screw up everything that was working at ReUse.

Demolitions were strong when they started because supporters offered ReUse the demolitions. These investors only needed so many demolitions done. Business dropped off and you can not run a demolition crew part time.

Volunteers are turned off by ReUse I think because it is very hard work. It is not for the faint of heart. College kids are not often enjoying lifting lumber and getting poked by nails. It takes a certain type of volunteer to be successful and that person is worth a dozen unskilled workers.

ReUse is in a slow growth period as I see it. Left to flourish on the vine I think it will prosper in a few years and some of its larger goals will be more reachable. As someone entrusted to helping to piece ReUse together I have to warn the board to try not to take any sharp turns with it.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"A leader is best when people barely know he exists, when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselves." (Lao Tzu)

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let me tell you about Harvey and Michael and why ReUse will fail. Michael built a successful non-for-profit out of nothing because he has energy, drive, ability and best of all charisma. Harvey can not even seem to fix his own house on Richmond Ave. Is he leaving it half repaired to drive down its value? If it is not a matter of fraud or laziness then is it some neurotic thing he does to punish his neighbors and the city? I mean yeah he got picked on by the city but doesnt that mean he comes with enemies? Are we trying to push ReUse to the fringe? I own a beautiful old victorian house on the West Side and I actually work on mine every year. Michael doesnt look like a handyman but he is. Harvey looks like one but I doubt he is one. I bet Harvey is one of those guys who doesnt do something unless it is perfect so nothing ever gets done. The difference between the two men is Michael can build something out of nothing but Harvey can not even seem to build something out of something.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let me tell you about Harvey and Michael and why ReUse will fail. Michael built a successful non-for-profit out of nothing because he has energy, drive, ability and best of all charisma. Harvey can not even seem to fix his own house on Richmond Ave. Is he leaving it half repaired to drive down its value? If it is not a matter of fraud or laziness then is it some neurotic thing he does to punish his neighbors and the city? I mean yeah he got picked on by the city but doesnt that mean he comes with enemies? Are we trying to push ReUse to the fringe? I own a beautiful old victorian house on the West Side and I actually work on mine every year. Michael doesnt look like a handyman but he is. Harvey looks like one but I doubt he is one. I bet Harvey is one of those guys who doesnt do something unless it is perfect so nothing ever gets done. The difference between the two men is Michael can build something out of nothing but Harvey can not even seem to build something out of something.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Once again; Buffalo, gun, shooting, foot. Really?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll