Packard Apartments Ribbon Cutting
Comments
Leave a commentAnd the huge showroom. Plus, I'm not sure you can think of this in terms of "per unit" cost. This isn't prefab with the main objective of housing. This is preservation with utility beyond aesthetics.
Bottom line: Lovely reuse of an historically significant building - priceless.
Why not market rate? The problem in Buffalo is not that there is unavailable affordable housing for the poor. Buffalo's core problem is that there is not decent housing for the middle class.
@Cintons Ditch
I am pretty sure the close to $3M the project got in special financing came with some strings.
In case you did not know, programs in NYS are to support the poor or unions. If you are middle class or working...tough.
Clitons, is absolutely correct. There is not enough decent housing for the middle class AND THE MAJORITY OF NEW HOUSING FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS AND THE MAJORITY OF NEW OFFICE PARKS FOR MIDDLE INCOME JOBS ARE IN THE AREAS OF SPRAWL. Areas outside of downtown, the surrounding urban neighborhoods and even the 1st tier suburbs of the 1950s.
The health of our entire region depends on ways to bring those new office parks and those middle income housing back into the city.
HOWEVER, LETS REMEMBER TWO THINGS PLEASE!
1) ST VINCENTS ORPHANAGE IS IN DANGER
2) OUR LADY OF NOTRE DAME DE LOURDES IS IN DANGER
Allentown is benefiting from the Center for Excellence in Life Sciences BUT IN MY OPINION THE MASTEN COMMUNITY is ripe to be the next allentown. Ripe because it is located in between the Center for Excellence to the South, Humboldt Park&Science Museum&Science BPS to the east and within is Artspace&Masten Armory&City Honors&Masten Park.
Our Lady of Lourdes de Notre Dame could emulate Righteous Babes on Delaware and new Westside Arts on Richmond if added to Artspace.
St Vincents would not have any problems with renting apartments so close to Packard and the other new developments if only it captured a developers interest. Its adjacent to the Packard and right behind the Squire.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT KNITTING TOGETHER THE ANCHORS OF A POTENTIAL COMMUNITY. IF ONLY....
The outside looks almost identical to the old photo, minus that awesome sign! But it's good to see this building in use and the outside preserved.
The pic of Byron with giant sissors in an instant classic.
Brian Davis standing next to him is icing on the cake, but even just those sissors are great. Very good job to the photographer.
So Brian Davis can make it to a ribbon cutting, but he can't make it to work at City Hall?
Looks like a quality renovation. Congrats! There is a building around the corner waiting for your talents.
This is a truly wonderful and affordable project which makes me also wonder about the financing. I also checked out the link describing other projects in the downtown area. Most of them are unaffordable which leads me to ponder the negative effects of gentrification.
My concern over this project and certain others is the subsidy factor. With my income in any of them, I would be subject to the maximum monthly rent. Call me whatever names you like (but, pleae keep it clean), but I don't want to pay $800/mo. and have to live next door to someone who pays only $237. I have been in that situation before. You can talk all you want about diversity and tolerance, but when you have employed people who need their sleep living next door to others who have no employment, no routine, and socialize at all hours, there is going to be a clash. Yes, I know the arguments about disabled people needing places and it is a valid one. However, with such close proximity in such housing, a little inconsideration goes a long way to big unpleasantness.
I would love to live in this facilty. As a single person, I would want the 3 bedroom unit and would be elated to pay only $800. But, what would be next door, above me, or below me?
LOL, I can't believe Brian Davis had the nerve to show up, even better is that Lord Byron allowed him to stand next to him. But then they are both idiots so go figure. Man, is City Hall screwed up!
The DHCR was responsible for just over $2M in financing through tax credits and NYS Housing Trust Fund dollars, while another $900K came from city housing funds in this overall $10M conversion.
And materials from out of state vendors were used on the project!
New York State is a joke.
The article, & especially the comments, on the Packard Building from 2007 is instructive. In a city with declining population, high unemployment, and low area median income, the most likely "white knight" for buildings like this is the incredibly complex combination of federal housing tax credits, state housing tax credits & federal historic rehab credits that were cobbled together to make this project work. If St. Vincents is saved (and Larry Regan considered buying that building & restoring it, but rejected it as too expensive & difficult at that time), or the German American Orphanage is reborn as St. Martin Village, it will only be because of the availability of a variety of tax credits that will attract equity investors to the projects. Even with the credits, they are often too expensive.
One of the benefits of the housing credit rules is that developers can use the metro area median income (rather than the city median income) in determining tenant eligibility. The state housing credits allow tenants to have income up to 90% of AMI, the federal credit up to 60%. Erie County AMI for a family of four in 2009 is $63,500 so a family of four can have household income of $57,150 and qualify for one of the 16 state credit units in the Packard Bldg. To get funded, Mr. Regan voluntarily agreed to scale that back to 80% - or $50,800. The other 24 units follow the federal housing credit rules. But state funding rules (DHCR) still require at least one person per bedroom, so a single person cannot rent a 3 bedroom unit, even if they can afford it.
These deals typically take one to two years to put all the pieces together, and that's before closing with the investor and construction lender and starting work.
That being the case, my single status and higher income would leave me with the one bedroom option for $800. A room for a study/office/media room would not be possible. So, and adjacent apartment that had 3 bedrooms might house a couple and their 4 or 5 children for the price of $237. Yup, not for the middle class residents in this project either. So, let's call this a development for the working poor. To that end, it works.
We'll be moving in the Packard lofts next month and look forward to growing with Main Street. As a young couple/company, this was a great opportunity to make new friends and maintain a presence downtown without spending an arm and a leg. Also, we're much more comfortable entertaining clients in this space than we would be in an older, smaller apartment we would have gotten for the same price. Can't wait to meet our new neighbors!
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




$10 million project / 40 units = $250k p/unit. Yikes!
Well, in the Subsidized Housing Hall Of Fame, there now is a luxury condo tower in Crown Heights in NYC that has been leased to an agency that houses the homeless at a cost of $2700 per month per unit. The landlord is clearly ecstatic to be able to continue making his mortgage payments and not lose his building to the banks, while the Bloomberg Administration can finally crow about helping the homeless (after years of lackluster leadership on the subject while he allowed condo towers to sprout everywhere). So this project just seems all the more de rigeur. In any event, it looks great!