City June 30, 2009 10:04 AM

Oddities #1

Oddities #1

Every so often you can find buildings with unusual details, compositions, or other distinctive elements. So, I thought I would start a new series, starting out with this beauty on Anderson Place, just a bit West of Elmwood.  This one has a spectacular and very unusual round Juliet dormer-balcony.  The shape and materials puts it in shingle style category. 

The Shingle style was an early form of modern architecture, so often buildings in this style are very experimental in form. This cantilever roof is quite rare, but can be found in other places around town if you keep your eyes peeled. I recently featured this one on Ada Place a few months.  

I am sorry, but I don't have much info on this one, so just walk by and take a look.  It is beautiful with or without me blathering on about it. 

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

that is one pretty porch. I love balconies, especially off the attic.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My house has a tower / turret (not sure the proper spelling) located at the right corner that extends about a half story above the roof. My house is in the west village on whitney place. I know the style is considered 2nd empire and has slate mansard roofs. Does anyone know the original purpose of the tower? I can't seem to figure out why it was part of the design other than it's intersting looking.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Towers and Turrets fall into the same category as Inglenooks.

Remember this was the romantic age before TV and before radio and when people read for entertainment. It was also an age when families were large, neighborhoods were dense and men and women didnt date but courted...sex was not casual and it was not done until after marriage (this was before condoms and before birth control).

So Towers and Turrets, Nooks and Inglenooks, were acceptable public places where people could have private moments whether alone to gather their thoughts, read, watch or as a couple holding hands...courting, talking, etc.

There was an asthetic purpose to them...but there was also a social purpose to them.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Towers, turrets, nooks and inglenooks are public places? What? And, they preceded the invention of the condom and birth control? That's about as accurate as your suggestion that sex never occurred until after marriage. You really have no sense of human nature, do you? It must be nice to continue your fabrication of the entire history of civilization, too.

replied to QueenCity
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

QC: I take your incite with the wisdom with which it was intended. Good post. I agree that reading nooks would have been much more appreciated than today. Back in the days when books were the main form of entertainment, such private getaways must have been completely charming. And when you say these would have been 'public' places, I think I know what you mean: public in the eyes of the family, not the rest of humanity; in other words: not in a room with closed doors; within view enough to make sure the courting couple keep it clean, but private enough that they can talk alone. And while lots of kids got knocked up before weddings, far fewer people had sexual freedoms we all inherited after the pill. Society's expectations of sexuality was quite repressed by today's standards. I'm sure all the adolescent kids went with their dates to these out of the way settings, away from irritating brothers and sisters and as far away from parents as one could get. I sure would have gone straight for a place like this. Who wouldn't?


In all honesty, QC, I thought this was one of your best posts. Seriously. Paul's usually more generous than that. Your typical rants get people all ready to pounce on you. But I appreciated these incites. Thanks for the perspective.

replied to QueenCity
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Biniskieiwicz, I'm more generous with you because you're knowledgeable. Even when I disagree with you, it's not because you haven't presented your talking points well.


QueenCity is confusing and merging a non-existent Ozzie and Harriet world with the constraints of the Victorian age and then imposing it upon his misguided notions of architecture.


I don't recall you ever doing that. :)

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If the Victorian world was all that constrained, they'd have never elected Buffalo's own Grover Cleveland after it came out during his presidential campaign that he probably (no DNA testing then) fathered an illegitimate child and hushed it up.

Contrast that with modern "liberated" times, in which infidelity is grounds for presidential impeachment.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lorem, the Victorian era was filled with hypocrisy and titillation despite its constraints. Every conservative era has its escapism.

replied to Lorem Ipsum
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Need I say more?

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

must remember . . . do not feed troll.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

biniszkiewicz, what do you mean: me or paul?

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I also think the previous article about the 4th floor residential building could fit into one of these posts... very odd but cool.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BT, towers are usually just for looks. Example: the twin towers of Richardson's State Hospital (on Forest) - there are neither rooms nor even stairs inside - just ladders. Purely for the exterior artistic effect.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Actually towers and turrets were usually just to add architectural interest, most were left unfinished and were accessible only through attic spaces. The exception would be the Italianate style where the glass box in the center of the roof was fitted out with built in benches to enjoy the view.
My grandmothers house in Riverside had a turret that was integrated into an attic bedroom during World War II but prior to that it was just storage space.
I did enjoy this space as a young man and have fond memories of hanging out reading or listening to music.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That may be true in your experience...BlackRockLifer but that was not the norm....

biniszkiewicz, you interpreted my meaning perfectly. Architecture reflected the norms of society within that period. Today people look for great rooms and master bedrooms with private master baths...if you take a look at the upper middle class and the homes of the wealthy these architectural details had purpose.
The Spanish Revivial designs of the 1901 Pan Am had purpose
The flowing lines of Art Nuveau had purpose
These came about in reference to what is referred to as the ROMANTIC PERIOD

The Frank Lloyd Wright designs were a stripped down version of EB Green...and the Arts and Crafts Movement and influences from Japanese craftsmanship all of which embraced the organic nature of craftsmanship. The geometric lines of Art Deco had purpose. THESE WERE THE ROOTS OF MODERNISM.

The Italianate Revival, Greek Revival, Federal, Georgian, Palladian, Beaux Arts...those designs had purpose. There was a big victorian influence...the US saw itself as the new ROME and it these periods reflected all the references to social structures, knowledge, government, etc.

Anyone who remembers the 1960s...and their "A" dresses...think pheobie in Friends, or That Girl etc. They were as plain and stripped down as possible...co-incidently so was the modernist and minimalist movements in architecture.

1970s hippie grunge came around just about the time of what I call planet of the apes brutalism in architecture.

I do not pay attention to PaulBuffalo and I would advise you not to either. The man doth protest to much and know not of what he speaks.

ITS WHY THE CITIES THAT ARE THE ABSOLUTE BEST IN THE WORLD ARE PLACES WHERE ONE IS CONNECTED TO THE PAST, THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE...AND SOMEHOW...IT ALL FITS TOGETHER.

BUFFALO HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE SUCH A PLACE...WE ARE RECOGNIZING THE VALUE OF OUR GOLDEN AGE...WE ARE BOTH RESTORING AND RECONSTRUCTING...AND THERE IS MUCH TO RECONSTRUCT. HOWEVER WITH BUFFALO 60% EMPTY WE HAVE PLENTY OF ROOM TO PROJECT OUR CITY INTO THE FUTURE WITHOUT HAVING TO SACRIFICE THE PAST AS OTHER CITIES MUST.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As for sex before marriage, from a textbook The Reshaping of Everyday Life 1790-1840 "In the 1780's and 1790's nearly one third of New England's brides were already with child, the frequency of sexual intercourse before marriage was surely higher since some couples would have escaped early pregnancy"

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks for the info, I guess I was sort of right in regard to the aesthetic element. Mine is finished with drywall and such but I plan to build a platform with a decorative ladder so that you can look out both windows, one of which has a view of the lake. Perhaps that was another potential use for the tower?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Can I buy that piece and put it on my house?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll