City June 1, 2009 1:22 PM

Buffalo, Meet Matthew Ricchiazzi

Buffalo, Meet Matthew Ricchiazzi
I first heard that Matt Ricchiazzi* was throwing his hat into the Mayoral Ring about six months ago. Someone sent me a link to his website, Change Buffalo. I also ran across a flyer in which Matt wrote about his deep desire to stir things up in the region (see flyer). The more I learned, the more I liked what Matt had to say. I liked his views on transportation and his desire to see UB continue to move more resources to the city. I found his Economic Development Strategy, promoting consolidation and stepped up marketing efforts, interesting. To me, many of his ideas were timely, while a few that appeared to be a bit radical needed to be fine-tuned.  

I met up with Matt a couple of weeks ago to learn more about what drives him. It turns out that Matt, a liberal republican, is incredibly well read when it comes to issues tackled by the likes of Jane Jacobs (vs Robert Moses) and Richard Florida. He's been intrigued by planning issues since he was a young boy. Matt grew up on the West Side of Buffalo, listening to his grandfather talk about the city's glory days. He's been schooled in the fields of Urban Planning and Public Policy - he feels that Buffalo has unfortunately looked at Urban Planning as a side function. Bit instead of dwelling on a long history of planning mistakes, Matt tends to focus on the opportunities to correct them. "Operational procedures tie The Mayor's hands," he told me. "We need a Chief Executive, not a Chief Bureaucrat. I am 100% committed to running."

I am convinced that Matthew Ricchiazzi will one day emerge as a driven, effective, out-of-the-box politician. Whether that is in Buffalo, or another city remains to be determined. In the meantime, I threw together some questions for him, which are featured below:

If you lived anywhere other than Buffalo, where would it be?

A personal motto of mine (which I'm pretty sure I lifted from an article in business school) is to live with a culture of discipline and the ethic of entrepreneurship.  I love Buffalo, and there's no place I'd rather be, but career-wise I want to start businesses.  And, frankly, I don't have confidence in the current political leadership to believe that the economy here will get better.  For the last 50 years they've squander our economy.  So, if I do ever move it will not be happily.  I hope I have an opportunity to rebuild Buffalo and bring the change and economic revival that we so desperately need.

Give me three projects that you would like to see completed in the next five years.

1-    Tear down the I-190 and replace it with waterfront parks

2-    New port facilities and rail-ship-truck transshipment facilities

3-    Large scale slum clearance and parks projects

4-    Extensive light rapid rail system

5-    High-speed rail connection between Buffalo and Toronto

Among many, many other projects...

Is there a politician (anywhere) that you admire?

I call myself a pragmatic objectivist: I want to understand our problems simply as they are, without the lens of ideological dogma and party entrenchment.

I have a great deal of respect for Barack Obama, who has--with the message of moderation and reason--brought people together and has gotten to the work of moderate governing.

I also have a great deal of admiration for Jack Kemp, the former WNY congressman, presidential candidate, vice presidential candidate, and HUD Secretary.  He was a real leader--he didn't follow polls, he changed opinions through robust and respectful discourse.  He was a policy innovator, a deep thinker, and he articulated a vision for his Party that was inclusive, diverse, and respectful.

Skyway: Keep it or leave it?

It needs to go.

Favorite book?

"The Death and Life of Great American Cities" by Jane Jacobs--its every urban planner's handbook.  I also really liked "City Making" by Gerald Frug, which is a tougher read, but if you're into urban theory and cosmopolitanism it's really great.

Give me an East Side quick fix. Not the entire solution, just an idea that could be implemented today.

There's an extraordinary housing disequilibrium that needs to be corrected: we have lag luster demand and a huge oversupply of unsalvageable and uninhabitable housing.  We need large-scale slum clearance of unsalvageable housing in a concentrated way (rather than the City's current "scatter-site" strategy).  Simultaneously, we need to replace that housing with beautiful park spaces that compliment and compete with the Olmsted system (rather than the current practice of leaving these already distressed neighborhoods with vacant lots, which further reduces demand).  Reducing oversupply and increasing demand (by virtue of new parks), will correct the disequilibrium and will make unsubsidized private sector investment plausible.

Three bad urban planning mistakes - and are they fixable?

Almost all of them.  We can't recreate architecturally significant buildings that we've already torn down, but we can make progress going forward.  We can tear down the I-190.  We can choose a Peace Bridge Plan (with shared boarder crossing) that restores Olmsted's plan for Front Park.  We can correct many of the alterations we've made to Ellicott's radial street plan.  We can make damn sure we enforce historic preservation ordinances.  But in addition to fixing the mistakes, we need to also be building the City better than it ever was before; and that takes innovative approaches, big ideas, grand thinking, and a strong sense of civic pride and purpose in every plan.

Your favorite food?

I'll get Ted's Hot Dogs to come back to Front Park.

School system - how hard is it to fix and what is preventing us from getting the job done?

We try to manage our schools via a committee we call the School Board, which leads to inherent inefficiencies with no one raising the bar and challenging the system to go further.  We can't manage a complicated organization effectively by committee--it doesn't work.  That's why I'm going to lobby the Governor and the State Legislature to disband the Buffalo School Board and to give us Mayoral control of the City Schools, as was done in New York City.  With czar-like authorities, we can start to implement comprehensive education reform that our children deserve.  There is a soft-bigotry to low expectations and complicacy.  This is the civil rights issue of our time, and frankly, the fact that Byron Brown has done nothing to improve our schools is an unconscionable betrayal that, under my leadership, will not continue.

Preservation. How important is it... really?

Absolutely critical.  Our architecture is an extraordinary civic asset that we need to leverage to attract new investment that compliments it.  Effective historic preservation, the restoration and reuse of architecturally significant buildings, and stringently enforced design guidelines for new construction in historic districts will give Buffalo a charm--a vibrancy--that increases neighborhood desirability, demand for housing, property values, and commercial activity. Preservation is absolutely critical.

Parking lots. Public transportation. Alternative transportation. Where should we be going?

We need to move very far away from parking lots.  We need to move very strongly towards mass transit and alternative transportation.  We need to make long-term light rapid rail investments in the City, with commuter rail lines linking the City and suburbs.  We need bike lanes on each thoroughfare, and a bikeway grid superimposed over the automobile grid so that bikers can travel across the City safely, quickly, and easily.  Giving people options is will allow them to choose an auto-independent lifestyle, which will save them money and allow for increased discretionary spending in our economy.  In addition to being good for the economy, its great for the environment and the reduction of carbon emissions.

Higher education. Are we a college town? Why are we not perceived as one?

We are a college town, but one of the major planning mistakes we've made was in the 1960s, when the SUNY decided to build UB North Campus in Amherst rather than downtown.  Imagine if UB were built in downtown--the collapse of Main Street's pedestrian mall never would have happened.  UB should by SUNY's flagship campus, made a world renowned research university.  I'd like to see UB expanded to 100,000 students.  I'd also like to see Buffalo State College expanded to 50,000 students.  This would be hugely beneficial to our economy--both for real estate and the commercialization of cutting edge research.

Role model?

My grandfather.  He had an idealistic, entrepreneurial, spirited zest for life from which I've learned a great deal.  I loved hearing the stories he would tell me what Buffalo was like decades ago, the people, the neighborhoods, the aspirations.  In many ways, he instilled in me my love of Buffalo.  I remember being 8 years old and reading every book about urban planning, Buffalo's history, and community development that I could find.

Ethanol. Wind. Solar. Hydro. What would you concentrate on?

We are geographically best situated to utilize wind resources--we have the lake affect.  Large scale investments should made to construct wind turbines, but we should also provide tax incentives for roof-top wind turbines and roof-top solar panels.

These technologies are great and have extraordinary promise to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but the lowest-hanging fruit in our region is actually in energy efficiency retrofitting.  The large majority of housing units in Buffalo are natural gas, which is great.  But with our harsh climate and very old housing stock, we can achieve massive reductions in carbon emissions by double-insulating houses, installing energy efficient windows and doors, installing natural gas fireplaces, and efficient appliances and fixtures.

Fresh water. Do we do enough to protect our waters?

Probably not.  Our water facility at LaSalle Park needs security enhancements to prevent contamination of the drinking supply.  In terms of protecting the Great Lakes as a freshwater source, progress has been made, and I understand that there is an agreement now in place that prevents waters from being diverted to non-Great Lakes states.  There are issues related to the St. Lawrence Seaway, which has introduced foreign organisms into Great Lakes waters.

Federal stimulus money. Are we getting our share?

Not nearly.  There is a lot of data on this; in fact we get very little stimulus money per capita, which is a shame given our chronic economic depression.

Albany. How do you get Albany to take Buffalo seriously. Are we represented properly?

We are not represented properly.  If elected, I will build a robust lobbying operation in both Albany and Washington.  I will be lobbying the Congress personally several times a month.  We need to hire lobbyists who will fight for appropriations and legislation that will help us rebuild our economy.  You can read my intergovernmental affairs strategy at changebuffalo.org for a fuller description of the legislation that I would introduce.  We need to stand up to the political machine in New York State--and Byron Brown will not stand up to the machine that brought him up.

You're a Republican. Are you expecting cross-party support?

I certainly hope so.  I'm a Republican because I think that the government should be smaller, our taxes should be lower, and our society should be more free--which makes me a fiscal conservative and a social liberal.  But the labels are unhelpful.  I think most people--particularly people of my generation--don't care if you're a Republican or a Democrat.  If you have a good idea that can create jobs or rebuild our City, then I want to hear it--regardless of Party affiliation.  I'm a pragmatic.  I'm objective.  I simply want to set goals and lay out plans to achieve them.  That doesn't have to petty, it doesn't have to be partisan, if we start electing a higher-caliber of leadership.

Your favorite subject?

Urban Planning was my undergraduate major, and I focused most heavily on economic development and understanding how regional economies develop specialized competencies.  I'm fascinated with urban planning, but I also very much enjoy economics, finance, corporate strategy, and organizational behavior.

Take on Regionalism?

Regionalism is Buffalo Niagara's only future.  The longer we maintain too much government for too few people, the longer we endure crippling property taxes, economic decline, population losses, and dysfunctional and fragmented decision making processes.  We can--and we must--do much better.  We need to work together through a regional government with a regional perspective.  We are all in the same boat sinking together.  I hope we realize that we need a radical new approach before its too late.

Favorite animal?

A certain labra-doodle named Jack.

One thing you learned from Jane Jacobs.

Lesson: that the common sense of a community is always more enlightened than self-aggrandizing bureaucrats.  Jane Jacobs was a visionary--she's under-recognized in the broad arch of American history.

One thing you learned from Richard Florida.

Lesson: that the creative economy can transform entire cities, generate extraordinary wealth, and breath new life into a city (both economically and socially).

High Taxes. A necessary evil?

An unnecessary evil.  We need to reduce out annual operational spending so that we can reduce property taxes.  New York State is--by far--the highest taxed state in the nation.  Forbes ranks Buffalo Niagara the 189th best place to do business.  That is shamefully unacceptable.  I want to make Buffalo the place where small businesses become big businesses; where entrepreneurs bring their dreams to fruition; where wealth and jobs are created.  We can't do that without lower taxes.

It is absolutely imperative that we reduce the size and cost of our government so that we can reduce the property tax levy in a meaningful way.

Buffalo's image. One step you would take to get the message out that things are looking up.

Everywhere I look in Buffalo I see nothing but potential.  I would hire a professional economic development staff of 50 people whose job will be sell Buffalo Niagara to the world's largest, most innovative, most promising companies.  We need to aggressively articulate why Buffalo Niagara is the place they should do business and to create jobs.  It is an inexcusable failure of leadership that we don't have anyone in City Hall that does that.  That should be core competency of our government.  Instead, Mayor Brown has decided not to even try.

Toronto. Friend or foe?

Toronto is a friend.  We will grow into each other and become the same metropolitan area (the fifth largest in North America, and one of the fastest growing in fact).  The more we become the same City, the stronger our economy will become.  We need to make traveling, doing business, working, and trading over the boarder as easy as possible.

NYC. Friend or foe?

New York is a friend, to the extent that we can create economic linkages with industries located there.  It is also a foe, to the extent that they suck state resources away from Upstate New York and dictate a political agenda that ignores the issues of Upstate.

Favorite sport?

Lacrosse.  The National College Lacrosse Championship last week between Cornell and Syracuse was pretty great--and pretty upsetting.

Urban sprawl. A necessary evil?

Not with an urban development boundary, regional land use planning, the elimination of a municipal role in development, transit oriented development, and policies that encourage infill development and urban investment.

Unions. Take 'em or leave 'em?

I'm not a fan of unions.  If they want to be a productive member of a forward thinking leadership team, then they'll have a seat at the leadership table.  If they want to be consumed with narrow interests and to obstruct progress and change, then they won't have a seat at the table.  That's up to them.  But when I have to decide between what's good for students vs. teachers, I'm going to side with students.  When I have to decide what's good for taxpayers vs. union members, I'm going to side with taxpayers.

If you had $132 million City Rainy Day Fund, what would you do with it, if anything?

I would partner with private sector lender(s) who are willing to match the $132 million, and create a Homeownership Financing Fund.  I would offer low and moderate income first time homebuyers subsidized mortgage capital that would be used to purchase existing housing units and to complete the energy-efficiency-retrofitting of those units.  The private partner(s) would originate and service the loans.  The loans would be packaged into mortgage-backed securities and sold, whereas to re-inject lending capital into the program perpetually.  Lending will be concentrated to focus on rebuilding a given neighborhood each year, whereas to create a catalytic affect.

City Manager? Or not?

No.  We should elect mayors with managerial competencies (like an MBA, for instance).  Currently the Mayor and Common Council squabble over the management of the City.  Imagine now that the Mayor has to squabble with both the Common Council and the City Manager.  We need a powerful Chief Executive, not a Chief Bureaucrat.

Tax incentives... Empire Zone - good or bad?

The ideal situation would be to have across the board low tax rates for every business everywhere.  But given the extraordinarily high tax rates that we endure, the Empire Zone programs are absolutely critical to keeping businesses here.

*Matthew Ricchiazzi is currently matriculating at Cornell University's Johnson Graduate School of Management, where he is expected to earn an MBA concentrated in private equity and venture capital.  He holds a BS in Urban & Regional Studies from Cornell University's Department of City & Regional Planning.  In 2007, he was a Public Policy & International Affairs Fellow at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School.  He has worked in legislative affairs with the National Congress of American Indians in Washington, DC.  As an undergraduate, he worked as a Community Organizer with the Industrial Areas Foundation and the Interfaith Community Organization in New York City.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

He's got some good ideas. If he could get quickly get a gut, shed some hair up top and shorten his name, he may actually get 8% of the poll.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

He has a logical common sense approach to the issues. The challenge is overcoming lack of experience. We all criticize city, county, and state government. I spout off all the time about common sense but I am aware the bureaucracy can make seemingly common sense solutions impossible to execute. I hope he doesn't become Mayor this term. I hope he gets involved in city government following his completion of graduate school and runs again later in his career, with more experience under his belt. If he does win, God bless him. He will have his work cut out for him.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Refreshing to see this kind of thinking. Id love to see this kid involved in local politics.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Good luck...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If the mayoral bid doesn't work out, he could always move into the Ellicott district...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Good ideas, just drop the "large scale slum clearance," bit, it neither meshes with Jane Jacobs (more appropriate for Moses) nor will its 60s era urban renewal iconography do anything but draw the ire of residents.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nick's right. I'm in agreement with 90% of Ricchiazzi's platform (yay, a candidate who reads Jane Jacobs!) except for slum clearance. The cities who embraced the most Urban Renewal, with the most forced relocation, were the cities who experienced the worst riots a few years later. There's nothing more alienating and disturbing that helplessly watching your neighborhood get bulldozed.


I'm also not convinced that unions are the enemy. Dumping on unions is symptomatic of the popular but oxymoronic belief that if only everyone would take a pay cut, we'd all be rich.


replied to nick
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

calling unions the enemy is strong language. Unions are made up of mostly honest working people, and I certainly wouldn't call them the enemy, even when I disagree with those people That said, unions do seem to be an impediment more than a force for community improvement. Perhaps they were an important check in the growth of capitalism that have outlived their usefulness. The UAW/GM labor model vs non-union auto labor seems to be indicative of the problem, they create a burden and adversarial relationship. Improved safety standards and federal laws have addressed the core issues that unions were built on. They now seem to be more about protecting employees(regardless of performance) and creating barriers to innovation with "that's not in my contract" attitudes amongst employees. And that's setting aside the pervasive corruption issues in some union leadership and what I will loosely call "negotiating" tactics. Unions are fossils and anything that can be done to reduce their presence in the labor force is a good thing for Buffalo's econonmy, for our schools and for our community.

replied to Lorem Ipsum
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think Matt is on track with a lot of his ideas. Unfortunately, a lot of his other ideas are a bit narrow-minded and smack of the "grand visioning" and the former ideas of "Urban Renewal" that resulted in downtown's veritable sea of parking lots and things like the Main Place Mall. He quotes Jacobs' ideas on community involvement, yet strives to consolidate almost all power in the hands of one mayor. Furthermore, a lot of his ideas (an economic development team to promote the city, etc) are already in play in the city. But I guess you can't fault someone who has been away for so many years.

The incredibly striking aspect of what we now see as the beginnings of Buffalo's rebirth has one common denominator across the spectrum - citizen involvement and commitment. I don't think Matt understands the extent to which the citizenry, rather than the mayor, has already had an impact.

Finally, I guess I would recommend that Matt read a book called "Location, Location, Location" written by former UB President Greiner. Everyone always (and I mean *always*) faults UB/SUNY for siting in Amherst rather than downtown. The space on UB's Amherst Campus is the one thing that will enable the university to expand into UB2020 and perhaps even beyond - bringing positive change to the region.


It's a great symbolic gesture to run for mayor while still obtaining a formal education. However, being situated in one field prevents the holistic view of the city that is needed for true vision. Come back from Ithaca Matt, live/eat/breathe the city for a few years - and then run for mayor. I'll be in the UK for my postgraduate education over the next four and fully intend on coming back (http://www.buffalorising.com/2009/04/buffalo-native-honored-on-2009-all-usa-academic-team.html) - it's awesome to hear that others are on the same wavelength.

And, to all those who hate long comments, I apologize. But I do say to Matt, to Darren (Emerald Beach), and any other college-aged adult looking to make this region a better place to live - let's meet at Sweetness 7 at some point this summer and help solidify its role as the think-tank for change it is quickly becoming...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

His natural constituency has already left the area. To get elected, he'd need to push the west side upbringing (to connect with those that have remained). Forget the labradoodle and lacrosse. Make it a rottweiler/pitbull/german shephard, and a tie between the Bills and the Sabres (for favorite sport). Never wear a tie in public. Be photographed at local bars beer in hand. Hold a press conference at Guercios.

replied to BuffOx
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

re: UB Amherst: I agree with you. Like many Buffalonians, I used to think UB Amherst was a tragic mistake; downtown would have been a home run for the city, I thought. That is, until I learned LaSalle Park was the proposed downtown location. LaSalle is far too small to fit what UB Amherst has become. Many students wouldn't have come to UB over the past three decades if it was on the lower west side. Now that urbanism is again popular (nationwide), UB is placing some facilities right downtown (and not in a waterfront park, either).


Anyway, this guy seems bright and potentially a force for good, but that's someday. Anyone just cutting his teeth, professionally speaking, would run into many roadblocks a more savvy veteran can avoid. Graduate first, become a success in another endeavor and then employ your wisdom and people skills for an executive political post. Running now is just ego and bluster, positioning himself for some future political career.

replied to BuffOx
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Have to disagree with the UB stuff. Even though the site downtown was smaller (shoreline apartments I believe) there would be plenty of room to build up. You would just have a taller more urban campus with less greenspace and surface parking. A lot of other campus buildings that take up space on North Campus such as the stadium, ctr for the arts and housing could have been integrated with downtown and the lower west side. It is a lot easier to build-expand on vacant, isolated suburban land but I and others maintain that it would have benifited the region much more if this development was injected into the heart of downtown.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

agreed! The path of least resistance is not necessarily the best choice for the community and growth!

replied to The Kettle
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Seems like a smart kid, who has a pulse on all the issues. If only that only sufficed to be a successful politician in this town (or any city for that matter). Simply saying you don't care for the unions doesn't address the fact that as Mayor of Buffalo, you have no choice but to deal with a unionized work force. I know there is a lot of dislike for Mayor Brown on this site, but he has done a very good job of hammering out union contracts over the past 3 years. This is critically important because like it or not, they aren't going anywhere and are a reality in city government. These contracts give the city much needed cost certainty. This is just one example of where this bright and admirable kid falls short in the reality test. I don't want to even get started on the "projects he would like to see completed in the next five years". All projects that would be great, but would require over trillions of dollars and way more than 5 years to complete feasibly.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes Brown did a good job with the union contracts. However in my opinion that doesnt trump the fact that he stood by while Buffalo got f@#$ed on tho colossal planning blunders and was involved in a restaurant scam that swindled taxpayers and vendors out of tens of thousands of dollars. At this point anybody looks like a better choice than Byron including this guy.

replied to bflobr
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If this kid can really get a Ted's back in the city, he's got my vote.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My knee jerk reaction is he says he wants lower taxes and calls himself a fiscal conservative, but look at all the additional govt spending he says he wants.
Many, maybe most, of his answers would mean even more spending than already happens (and as we know, a LOT already happens).
Based on this interview he doesn't sound like an improvement over Brown or Kearns.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

whatever: "My knee jerk reaction is he says he wants lower taxes and calls himself a fiscal conservative, but look at all the additional govt spending he says he wants:

exactly. Who will pay for the following issues he says he'd like to accomplish in the next 5 years: "Tear down the I-190 and replace it with waterfront parks; New port facilities and rail-ship-truck transshipment facilities; Large scale slum clearance and parks projects; Extensive light rapid rail; High-speed rail connection between Buffalo and Toronto (?)

Also, lets not forget that tearing down the I-190 and building new port facilities and rail-ship-truck transhipment facilities are mutually exclusive since transportation logistics are all about transportation connectivity.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Good point about the transportaion contradiction. And not only would replacing the 190 with parks be very un-fiscally-conservative, it's a bad idea in general. Tons of borrowed money to irresponsibly spend on solving a problem that doesn't exist (lack of parks) and create brand new problems (even more traffic slowdowns for cars and trucks - especially at rush hour), all while ignoring real problems facing average Buffalonians.


Sounds like a lot of expensive pie-in-the-sky silver bullets that have everything to do with pandering to cheerleaders and very little to do with improving average people's quality of life or attracting private sector jobs. Granted, attracting a lot of jobs around here is probably be next to impossible any time soon no matter who is mayor, but that's all the more reason for state and local govts to live within their (our) means and not be spendaholics on crazy feel-good projects.


This guy's ideas would cause taxes to go up higher even more than they're going up already. He sounds a lot like QueensEyes often sounds, but at least QE doesn't pretend to be a fiscal conservative tax cut advocate.

replied to bflobr
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not having read Greiner's book (maybe he'll open my eyes, as I'll check it out now) I'd still have to say I agree with the premise that it's blow not to have UB downtown. Keep in mind not only is the human traffic a loss, but the greening, landscaping and environmental consciouness a university brings would have been invaluable growth assets to the downtown corridor. And as far as expansion goes, it seems to me there's no shortage of vacant and abandoned spaces in the city for the university or any large scale enterprise that wants grow.

Your post was good Buffox and I agree there is a lot happening that doesn't get enough attention or credit. In fact, I'm so convinced of the signs of rebirth of the west side that we just bought a house around the corner from sweetness 7. But I think an interview focused on him doesn't allow him to treat those topics and misses the bigger picture of what his way of thinking represents, which is the changing face of conservatism. Increasingly I see young convervatives who call themselves republicans, but see social agenda of the republican party as antiquated and inconsistent with the principles of limited government and self determinism that are supposed to drive the party. I believe this is the future of the conservatism, a philosophy that needs to be embraced for WNYs survival and its a philosophy that doesn't need to exclude and divide in the way the national republican party has.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are a lot of good progressively minded ideas, are you sure that you are not a RINO?

In looking at the website, there are also a lot of....lets face it juevenile ideals. Slum Clearing? really? try: "Landbanking"....very PC.

Anywho, the enthusiasm is there, and my gosh there is most certainly a vision! You might be able to sway this bleeding heart...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


This is the closest I will EVER come to a man-crush with a politician.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

swoon...

replied to Really?
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I never get all the UB downtown talk. It wouldn't have saved anything, and UB wouldn't have become what it is today.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Spot on! If UB was downtown we wouldn't have the Erie Basin Marina, we wouldn't have the waterfront redevelopment project, and we wouldn't have the flagship of the SUNY system.

replied to DMZ
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And I realize he isn't the only one talking up high speed rail to Toronto, but all U.S. politicians should stop pretending that's a serious possibility.
That's something the Canadian govt and taxpayers would have to fund and build, and it's doubtful they'll have much motivation for it. AS far as I know, they don't even plan HSR between TO and Ottawa or Montreal, but people think they'd want to pay for building it to Buffalo?
It might not be all that "high speed" anyway, considering the turns around Lake Ontario.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@ Whatever

I am not sure where you get your info to claim that the Canadian govt and taxpayers have little motivation to build a HS rail connection.

In fact, a study titled "Infrastructure and the Economy: Future directions for Ontario" was published last year. It claims that "A multi-billion-dollar high-speed rail system that links cities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe is crucial to Ontario's long-term economic success".......

Where I think you are wrong in your thinking is you are thinking like someone in WNY. The reality is, the Toronto Metro region and Ontario want to develop into even more of a MEGA region than what exists today. They are anticipating a population increase of 15M by 2021 and another 2M in Toronto.

They want to develop the Northern and Southern regions of the city but do not want to build massive highway infrastructure for obvious environmental and logistical reasons. The solution is creating a MASSIVE rail network throughout the region.

All WNY would have to do is connect to the tail end of this network in Niagara Falls.

Furthermore, if you consider the higher probability of rail in NYS, because it is not definite yet, one could say the expansion to the South for Toronto would be more appealing than to the North if everything worked out.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First, I should correct myself. For my earlier comparison, I should've written QueenCity/QC instead of QueensEyes/QE. That's a better comparison. QC is more of an advocate of big "crazy" projects.


Second, to Really? - Studies aren't convincing to me because one can find studies to recommend a lot of things that never catch on. Sometimes one study contradicts another.
I understand TO is a mega-region. That doesn't imply that the govt up there considers an HSR line from TO to the border down here to be a smart use of the Canadian budget. Do they even have plans for any HSR line to connect their own business capital (TO) with their govt capital Ottawa, and/or Ottawa or TO with Montreal? That sounds like more of a cost/benefit positive for them, but maybe those HSR lines aren't even considered worthwhile by them any time soon.


Has any member of the Canadian cabinet (or shadow cabinet member in either of their opposition parties) ever said that HSR from Toronto-Buffalo is even a medium-level spending priority from their point of view?


If Canada isn't even saying that in a serious way, then it's but a distraction to hear Louise Slaughter and some other U.S. politicians, now this guy, saying Canada should do it. If Slaughter or any U.S. politician wants to make that happen up there, maybe they'd need to emigrate and run for political office in Canada with that as a campaign issue and see if the voters agree.
No doubt it'd be nice for Buffalo if it happened. It'd make a lot more sense than HSR to Rochester or Syracuse. Also, considering the geography between TO and Ft. Erie, I don't know how fast an average rail speed is feasible. For many reasons, it should be a non-issue in Buffalo's mayoral campaign.

replied to Really?
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

some good ideas, that a lot of people share. unfortunately, he does little to explain the financial aspect or funds for a lot of his ideas, considering we have such little private capital in the city. in addition, being a libertarian, I greatly agree with his downsizing of government, but he contradicts himself in seeking more federal stimulus money. finally, his idea of UB being a 100,000 student school is beyond ridiculous as well as BSU being 50,000. BSU is at best a commuter school until it begins to separate from a substitute of UB to a rival in terms of student academic accomplishments. In addition, there is not US university at 100,000 student mark, including both grad and undergrad, and only a handful at or above 50,000 combined - see OSU, Michigan, UT. Also, the high speed rail to Toronto is questionable since there are few businesses between the 2 cities that require that type of transportation. I think it was evident with the failed rochester ferry to there that "leisure" travel from WNY to toronto is limited at best. the only benefit foreseeable is easier access to our aiport unless the high speed rail was NYC-Buff-Toronto, which makes more economic sense.

Being someone who plans to run for office at some point myself, he carries some great ideals - especially downsizing and regionalizing the repetitive governments in buffalo and reducing the public sector work force while lowering taxes. His great flaw is lack of generating private investment or making the community accessible for buisnesses to re-locate form out of state. He is correct in that NYS basically ties your hands, and until we become a less regulated state (not going to happen) buffalo can only do its best to un-tie the hands of our local and county tax laws to support economic growth and investment.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As for the UB in downtown...it would have been nice to happen but it NEVER could have happened.

I like the fact that he mentions Buffalo State in the same breath as UB. A lot of the desired effects of a "Downtown UB" can be accomplished with a bigger Buffalo State.

I also like the focus on parks. I personally think one solution to the "East Side" would be to demo (by deconstruction any house of value) several blocks (10+) and make a HUGE PARK. This would force the compaction of residents AND improve the value of the properties directly around the park. Where to get the money for this is another question....

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whatever>"Good point about the transportaion contradiction. And not only would replacing the 190 with parks be very un-fiscally-conservative, it's a bad idea in general. Tons of borrowed money to irresponsibly spend on solving a problem that doesn't exist (lack of parks) and create brand new problems (even more traffic slowdowns for cars and trucks - especially at rush hour), all while ignoring real problems facing average Buffalonians.


Sounds like a lot of expensive pie-in-the-sky silver bullets that have everything to do with pandering to cheerleaders and very little to do with improving average people's quality of life or attracting private sector jobs. Granted, attracting a lot of jobs around here is probably be next to impossible any time soon no matter who is mayor, but that's all the more reason for state and local govts to live within their (our) means and not be spendaholics on crazy feel-good projects. "

I guess the highway thing depends on your perspective. If you use the highway every day and value the short commute time it gives you I could see why you would consider its removal wasteful. But if you were a resident of one of the neighborhoods that would stand to benifit you may think it was a great idea. The large expense in removing the 50s era roadway could be justified as long as the tangable benifit equaled the cost. There would of course no longer be a need to maintain or expand a roadway that no longer existed. Also there would no doubt be an increase of property values of the neighborhood it runs through that would suddenly become waterfront property. There will also be a health benifit as more people will use public transportation or maybe even ride the bike rather than use the thruway. And there is the intangable pride the comminity would feel from turning a wasteland into miles of waterfront greenspace.

The cost of, in my opinion, right sizing our road system may not be as expensive or difficult to fund as you think. The govt is of course had no problem obtaining money to demolish then replace the elevated section of rt 5 in S. Buffalo. This project unlike outright removal has no tangible benifit to the community other than keeping the 20 min commute alive for a few southtowners. Spending millions to keep things the way they are seems like a much larger waste of resources than demolishing a highway in favor of a park.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

pit>"If you use the highway every day and value the short commute time it gives you I could see why you would consider its removal wasteful."

It shouldn't be looked at in an individual sense, but in the big picture.


It's a safe bet most of the many cars and trucks who travel the 190 every day are doing so for purposes that economically benefit the city and region, not just for joy rides. So one need not personally use the 190 every day (or the 290, or Rte 5, etc.) to realize that efficient transportation or workers and product goods is much more of an economic positive than would be, for example, adding a bunch of more parks - very expensive-to-create parks in this case.


Removing the 190 would be another very business-hostile act around here. 190 removal isn't going to happen anyhow, obviously, but when a candidate suggests it that's a good indication of him or her having a business-hostile and money-wasting outlook.

replied to The Kettle
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

One last thing on waterfront highway removal. Not sure why you paint this idea with the "business hostile" brush. Not sure what the drawaback to the business community would be by eliminating fume belching cars and trucks from prime property. The commute time would be lengthened but a project that would have such a positive impact to local quality of life would more than negate this minor inconvenience. If you are a property owner nearby the 190 that would stand to benifit from increased property values you wouldnt consider this anti business at all.

If I may use a whateverisim to illustrate the pros of removing the 190, think of it as simple supply and demand. These highways were planned(poorly) in the auto crazed 50s when Buffalo was roughly twice its population and getting bigger. Today we are a srinking city and planning such requires a non traditional way of development. Infrastructure, that has less need than its intended use ought to be removed to reduce the overhead for the shrinking tax base. Oft discussed landbanking sounds good but is tough to implement if people living in the area do not want to move. Removing the 50s era highway system is a much better place to start. Property values, the environment and quality of life would improve as a result.

If the initial outlay of funding to remove the highways seems "anti business" think of the high cost as an investment in a smaller infrastructure, lower tax future. And again if funding can be found for highway demolition-reconstruction than there should be money availible to right size our road system.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with Iluvpitbulls on this one. We need to remove the Niagara Thruway from Sheridan Drive to Blasdell. I didn't think this way before but now I am convinced (seriously, I am). I think we could downgrade all of these cement chutes to a nice greenway like they have in Canada, the same is true with the 198. Bring them all back to parkways and beautify the entire area.

replied to The Kettle
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Pit>"think of the high cost as an investment in a smaller infrastructure, lower tax future"


Removing the 190 wouldn't cause lower taxes, even after the removal project was paid off. With the 190 removal causing less business activity here than would happen if it stayed in place, the set of people and businesses that are still here at that time (the "tax base") would have to each pay more to make up the difference.


OBrien>"We need to remove the Niagara Thruway from Sheridan Drive to Blasdell. ...we could downgrade all of these cement chutes to a nice greenway like they have in Canada,


Sure, we "could" do a lot of things, but we should upfront admit what consequences we're willing to accept. Is this the same OBrien who complains about high taxes and the weak local job market? Removing the 190 would be a great way to even further raise taxes and weaken jobs.


It would add a lot of govt spending over and above what would happen otherwise. There's only two ways to pay for that - one is taxes and the other is borrowing (which has to be paid back by future taxes). Then after the removal, as Colin explained (which shouldn't have even needed explaining), cars and trucks would move around the area less efficiently with obvious impacts on business activity. So we'd pay even more in taxes and we'd end up with something prettier for some people to look at, but less economically beneficial to the area as a whole.


It all depends what people want. If they want an even smaller local economy (and smaller job market) compared to what it would be otherwise, then it would succeed.

replied to O'Brien
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In 60 years Jane Jacobs and Richard Florida will be viewed just like Robert Moses is today. Their ideas are sound to solve problems of today but lack the foresight needed to meet the changing needs of the world.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This guy has it right, for once someone who sees the whole picture.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thank you to everyone for your comments--keep them coming!

Too often politicians try to temper or hide their views, trying to turn themselves into a product with broad market appeal. But we don't need political hackery anymore; we need leadership. And so, I take precisely the opposite approach. I want to share my views openly, in a way that is untempered, unfiltered, and entirely honest.

We need a higher caliber of leadership. The first step towards that goal is creating a robust, meaningful, and informed public discourse (and I'm very encouraged to see it here). I hope you will read some of the thoughts that I outline on my website, and I hope that you will all continue to contribute to the public discourse that we surely need.

A few thoughts on some of the comments above:

1) Opposition to "large-scale slum clearance" - Planning is all about context, and 1960's slum clearance isn't what we're talking about. In the 1960s, slum clearance was--in practice--the large scale elimination of affordable housing units, not replacing those affordable units, forcing the dislocation of marginalized populations, and concentrating poverty into high density public housing complexes. In the context of present-day Buffalo, we won't be eliminating affordable units (as most are vacant and uninhabitable). We won't be forcing the dislocation of marginalized populations; instead we will couple these policies with affordable housing programs which we'll make available to those individuals inconvenienced. We have an official vacancy rate around 25%, but if you include vacant lots (and, no official study has been done on this), we can reasonable approximate the "real vacancy rate" is upwards of 40%. I agree that "slum clearance" sounds unfriendly and has a shameful history, but in Buffalo today we need to take aggressive steps in correcting our housing disequilibrium.

2) Opposition to "grand visioning" - For too long we've been disappointed by political leaders that have been unable to deliver results. And so, we've resented big ideas and big thinking and the political machine has decided not to think in the long term or on a grand scale, fearing that they won't be able to deliver on campaign promises. I'd much rather raise the bar for our political leaders, set aspirational and challenging goals, and to articulate an alternative future for our City. Even if I fail publicly, I will have set the bar higher and--hopefully--dispel the concept of "managed decline" that our political establishment embraces. Don't inhale the stale air of orthodoxy. Don't let them tell you our decline is inevitable. Mediocrity is unacceptable to me, and I hope its unacceptable to you too.

3) Fiscal conservatism - We need to dramatically reduce our annual operational spending through increased operational efficiencies and streamlining the size and scope of City government (through automation, privatization, regionalization, or the devolution of service delivery to not-for-profit intermediaries). Simultaneously, we need to make capital investments in economic infrastructure without engaging in long-term debt (which can be done by drastically reducing operational spending, and robust intergovernmental affairs efforts aiming to leverage legislative spending and appropriations at the federal and state level). I will not allow the City to incur large levels of debt to make these long term investments. And, obviously, the public-private partnership model is a preferred approach.

4) UB expansion and location - There are a number of very large Universities and 100,000 students is not outside the realm of possibility (ASU, OSU, and UMN are each above 60,000 students). Imagine UB's 25,000 students living and studying in downtown Buffalo--the City would be thriving: nightlife, shopping, housing, etc. The entire character of the City would be far more vibrant, housing demand would be far higher, neighborhoods far more desirable.

5) Removal of the I-190 - Does it make sense that we use five miles of our waterfront--the most valuable real estate in the City--for a highway? Not at all. Tearing down the 190 and replacing it with waterfront parks will breath new life into waterfront neighborhoods. Property demand will increase, as will the density of development, and the property tax revenues generated from more desirable neighborhoods with a higher quality of life. This is far from juvenile--John Norquist, former Mayor of Milwaukee and President of the Congress for New Urbanism, has argued for the idea. Cities like Milwaukee, Portland, and Louisville have done just that, with incredible success. Buffalo's waterfront can be the most beautiful in the world--I won't let a highway stand in our way.

6) Lack of experience critique - I'm uniquely well prepared to address the extraordinary challenges that the City faces. Now more than ever we need an MBA-Mayor who is also an urban planner, someone who's worked in legislative affairs in DC and as a community organizer in environmental justice communities. Lets look at Byron Brown's experience: he has decades of all the experience that has been killing us, offering mediocre leadership in dysfunctional governments and doing nothing of consequence (9 years on the common council, 4 years in the state senate, and 4 years as mayor). For the last 50 uninterrupted years the one-party political machine (the worst this side of Chicago) has run our city into the ground. Let's stop electing the machine that dug us into this hole.


The current and previous generations of Buffalo Niagara's leadership have squandered my generation's future in this City. I don't have the stomach to sit on the sidelines; I don't have the heart to standby and let that happen. My message is simple: don't squander our future; don't mitigate our promise or potential; don't vote for more of the same. Vote for change.


Anyways, thanks so much for all the comments. I hope I have the chance to meet and talk with many of you about our City's challenges and policies that we need to rebuild this City that we love.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BR promotes a republican, big surprise.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I had a good time reading through his website and found most of the ideas very simplistic and sometimes contradictory. I believe that he may be underestimating what it takes to run a city, or organization, the size of Buffalo, especially when it comes to fiscal stability and labor relations. You may look at the Mayor in much the same way that a line worker looks at the CEO, with a limited scope on the true activities that take place from day to day. Sure, there are a lot of photo ops and press conferences, but there are also very serious negotiations with labor, and hard decisions to be made about spending in the city. The Change Buffalo plan is short on feasible ideas for both areas. The website is also light on ideas for reducing crime and improving schools. I am not convinced that subsidizing for-profit organizations, buying grain elevators to create art galleries, or paying for students to see three plays a year is really a responsible way of spending our scarce resources.


I am also not convinced that moving the elderly into housing projects is a truly sound idea. It seems like a convenient way to solve two problems, but it shows a lack of understanding and empathy for the elderly and the poor. Why not just call both groups undesirable and confine them to sub-standard living conditions in the least desirable areas of the city. I would love to see you try to convince my grandmother and her friends that this is a good idea. Please Ms. P, leave your home that you raised your family in for 35 years and move to the projects. Good luck with that one. You can dress up the projects and move out the poor, but they are still projects when you are done. The elderly deserve better, and if you look at the competition from the suburbs, you will realize that Buffalo will need to do a lot better if they expect to keep these residents in the city limits.


I wonder about the decision to offer tax breaks and subsidies to only a select few organizations, primarily art galleries, media outlets, and selective artist communities. What are you going to tell the small business owners and residents who will be making up the difference in tax revenue? Go see a play, it's free? That could be a good campaign slogan. Three for free from Ricchie.


I would really like to see you demise the CSEA and other groups and force them to re-apply for their jobs. That is far too idealistic and highlights the lack of experience in dealing with unions. They will have you in court before your hand even leaves "the rise of the creative class" during your inauguration.


I see that you have some experience with lobbying government, but it apparently one or two steps removed from the real action. You can lobby Washington and Albany, but that doesn't guarantee that we will receive money to support basic infrastructure and pet projects. Granted, we could do a better job of lobbying to secure our interests, but to build a budget based on help from the financially strapped government is naive. The days of rampant spending on pet projects under the guise of economic stimulus are numbered. I have a feeling that America is going to regret some of the actions that have taken place this year and we will become more tight-fisted as a society. A fiscal conservative would realize that.


I wonder what your plans are for building industry, reducing crime, and adding non-government jobs to the region. I see your references to small business, but you lack the understanding of big business. You need to understand that NY is one of the most heavily taxed states in America, and it is not attractive to large businesses. We may get a few, but that may only serve to balance out the companies that are leaving. I heard today that Rich Products is looking to move more jobs to Nashville in the next six months due to the recent announcement by Governor Patterson. How do you plan on countering that?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well whynot you don't have to agree with the guy or his ideas but you're going to have to do better than countering everything he's proposed with a simple, yet long winded, "he has no experience." It took you 6 paragraphs to say that you know.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great. Make it happen. It is too bad that you've decided to run as a Republican, the party of hatred and social divisiveness. If you ran on ANY other party line, you'd have my vote.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's one thing to know what you'd want to do, it's another to know how to do it. I like a smart, fresh face as much as anybody, but you have to have an instinct, a gut, and some sharp elbows to change a city's ways, especially in Buffalo. The kid needs some seasoning. Run for Common Council, and for god's sake, lose the stupid party affiliation.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yo, i think i'm in love. lol
does it get any better than this?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

this kid is a stud. If he speaks as well as he sounds in his interview and with a powerful voice, he could make a great candidate if he has a good enough of a campaign.

His ideas are amazing. take a look at his website

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"His ideas are amazing. take a look at his website"


Amazingly bad, based on whynot's description of what the website says.


Illegal:
- "CSEA and other groups and force them to re-apply for their jobs"


Should be illegal:
- "paying for students to see three plays a year"
- "buying grain elevators to create art galleries"
- "tax breaks and subsidies to only a select few organizations, primarily art galleries, media outlets, and selective artist communities"


Bizarre and/or far outside the powers of a Buffalo mayor:
- many of his proposals

replied to Redhawk10
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Forget the highway and HSR stuff for a second.

Clearly you have a differnt vision of how Buffalo and WNY should look than that of this candidate or myself for that matter.
But even you have to be able to like the idea of an outsider throwing his hat into the ring for the mayors office.
If people like this dont come out and challenge the establishment you will contiue to see mayors serve 15+ year terms and who are so powerful that they can participate in restaurant scams and not face the music. Is that what you want? Is that good for business?

I know this sort of radical thinking scares people who would like to see things kept the way they are no matter how bad things get. But even if you do not agree with this thinking you have to admit his participation as well as participation from anybody else is good for Buffalo. Just because these ideas seem "bizzare" doesnt mean they arnt worth bringing to the table. Ill take bizzare and honest over run of the mill and dishonest any day.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with you. Give the young man credit for having vision. Considering his long list of ideas, would it be any surprise that one would not agree with all of them? The only 'bizarre' aspect to this are those that are only interested in maintaining the status quo in Buffalo and who, by consequence, discourage the energy of young people like Mr. Ricchiazzi. It's no wonder so many young folks want to move out of Buffalo.

replied to The Kettle
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"But even you have to be able to like the idea of an outsider throwing his hat into the ring for the mayors office."


I don't like nor dislike the idea of an outsider with worse ideas than Brown running against him. If I went to a bad movie because I felt like going to a movie and it was the least bad one playing, then would I "be able to like the idea" (using your words) that an adjacent theater was showing something worse? Would I like that better because I had a choice? Maybe slightly. Not much.


Anyway, where did I write anything negative about his decision to run? Some others above may have commented that he shouldn't run, but I didn't write that. Never would. I'm glad I live in a country where he can run if he wants to.


Even considering Brown's flaws (of which there's many, and I'm glad I voted against him last time), I don't buy the idea that every outsider deserves support. It's good to be open minded enough to listen to what all challengers say, but once we hear it there's no logical reason to not hold what they say up to the same standards we use to assess Brown. In fact, it'd be dumb and unfair to not do that.


A few of us did that above. The criticism looks thoughtful and reasonable. If the November ballot is Brown as the D vs. this guy as the R, then I'll vote for Brown using the same reasoning that I used to prefer Helfer over Brown last time.

replied to The Kettle
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you and other voters can see past browns dishonesty to vote for him thats a real shame. If a ceo of a private company had his hands in a similar scandal, they would be out on the street.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Articulate, good looking, and popular... sounds like a white Obama.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yikes... this is taken from his website: "Establish a University at Buffalo Medical School"... kind of like the one that was founded 161 years ago? Also, I cringe to think of what the West Side would have looked like had it been pot marked with a sea of surface parking lots so endemic to North Campus. Though I'm not the biggest fan of UB's suburban campus in Amherst the truth is that most of the explosive growth that has allowed UB to become the largest public university in the Northeast has happened on this campus.

UB's development as the flagship university of the SUNY system has allowed it to better position itself for downtown entry and operation. Through the current and future placement of its health services and R&D related fields downtown, the University has the unique opportunity to create a synergistic environment with both business interests and the community at large, something that would not have been possible without the foresight of several decades. Still I applaud many of his ideas. Its great to see another college-aged student committed to the region. I truly excited for what this next generation of leaders will bring.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

1. Why are we discussing someone who would be lucky to get 1% of the vote? This guy seems like the male version of Tracy Flick.


2. It shouldn't be that hard to understand why removing the 190 would be bad for businesses. They use it to move their products and workers as efficiently as possible. Improved quality of life and waterfront access are great, but they don't help business, at least not enough to offset the damage. Replacing the 190 in some less valuable area would obviously be ideal, but I'm not holding my breath.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"1. Why are we discussing someone who would be lucky to get 1% of the vote? This guy seems like the male version of Tracy Flick."

If nothing else its good to see an outsider get involved in the mayoral race. This office has been dominated by career driven, machine style politicians for as long as I can remember.

In another discussion other posters and I were talking about the importance of getting involved in politics weather its simply voting or running for office. To me it is refreshing to see someone disatisfied with the way things are and doing somthing to change it rather than just complain. This grassroots participation is healthy for all who value democracy. If people like this dont step forward and rock the boat you will continue to see politicians with virtual life terms who are powerful enough to participate in a restaurant scam and not face any political consequences.

I hope he gets more than one percent of the vote but if he doesnt win a strong showing could at least convince some of the career politicians to add some of his progressive ideas to their platform.

replied to Colin
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Population densities (people per square kilometer), says wikipedia:

Fort Erie: 180
Ontario's Niagara Region: 233

Buffalo: 2,782


The area around Fort Erie looks very nice, but its economy and population density are much smaller than Buffalo's so naturally it has less need for transortation infrastructure. Compared to Fort Erie, the Buffalo needs a larger economy and a lot more business activity to keep its larger population employed. At least that's true in this in this day and age.


200 years ago, Buffalo and the Fort Erie area, whatever it was called at the time, had very similarly sized economies and population densities. Perhaps some day in the future that will be the case again. That's anyone's guess. But for now, it's a weak comparison to say "Well, they don't need as many high speed roads, so that proves Buffalo doesn't need them either."

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yea, more park talk.

Take a walk around MLK Jr park and let me know how well the house values are around it. Parks compliment vibrant neighborhoods. They do not create them.

Do use the east side deconstruction to link parks back up, etc. But do not dillude yourself into thinking that they will jump start anything.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


@MJ Worthington


I have to disagree with you on the parks....with the caveat that it depends on the park.

MKL park is small and does not create a boundary that a park 4 times the size would. The reality with the East Side, IMHO, is that it needs to be divided into multiple areas.

A large park that spans both Broadway and William St could in effect push the "Safe Area" over Main Street and into the "East Side", which would in fact create a positive effect.

While massive parks have not been created in major cities in the last 100 years, a comparable development trend to parks has been achieved with sports stadiums.

In both San Francisco and San Diego, large areas of what was once bad neighborhoods have evolved to highly desirable locations.

So I would have to disagree that parks do not create neighborhoods. They can if done on the right scale and in the right place.

replied to MJ Worthington
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

sold.

but nobody will be able to get rid of the 190

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah well we ain't rich folks here and I don't trust these college boys with their fancy learnings and big words. And if you noticed there ain't nothin there about letting strip clubs back in the city or bringing a steel company back!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

no tear no skyway down.

go to see: http://www.ranwebber.com/Skyway_Project.html

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

btw, Paul - If you're implying I criticized this guy due in any way to his age or inexperience, that couldn't be more wrong. In the last mayor's race there was a woman of - shall we say, more mature years, who ran as the Green candidate with a lot of what I considered harmful bad ideas that remind me of these. I would have preferred Brown to her too. Same thing here. I don't see anything wrong with a young inexperienced mayor if it's one a good set of ideas.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whatever, I wasn't criticizing you specifically but you are panning Mr. Ricchiazzi's ideas as 'bizarre'. At least he's willing to throw his many ideas on the board for debate whereas Mr. Brown, a more polished man than his mayoral predecessor, rarely takes a stand on any issue. (In addition, he has the unfortunate ability to bungle a project as simple as the Wingate Hotel.) I'd rather have someone who has ideas that can be addressed through compromise.


His ideas may seem strange to you, but you're a Libertarian who seems to want tax dollars spent on nothing but police safety so that the free market can work out everything else. I'm probably exaggerating your world view -- at least I hope I am -- but your views often seem strange to me. You've not expressed any interest in architecture or urban planning as a solution and a number of Mr. Ricchiazzi's ideas rely on it. That would have my support.


Young people may have similar ideas (that are not yours) that include seeing the value of dismantling the I-90 and the skyway, and reusing grain elevators. You labeled Mr. Ricchiazzi's idea of paying for students to see three plays a year as something that should be illegal, yet I was lucky enough to see the Buffalo Philharmonic a few times as a child due to government (county?) funding for such endeavors. My family was too poor to afford that for me, but those experiences were my introduction to a love of classical music.


I don't agree with Mr. Ricchiazzi's desire for more parks, for example, but presenting such ideas gets citizens to think about development issues in new ways to determine their validity. Mssrs. Brown and Higgins have turned the tantalizing development of the waterfront into a probable outdoor shopping mall. I don't see vision there. I see safe political moves that simply get them elected next time.


replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Very well said. I will add that many of the areas Libertarian/conservatives are okay with big govt spending as long as its done on needless roadways and IDA handouts to businesses and other public projects they deem "realistic". Its when govt funding is proposed for quality of life improvements that disrupt the status quo such as removing needless highways, high speed rail etc that the "tax and spend" and "free market" talk comes out.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Paul, I don't see Brown as indecisive as you see him. My beef with him is he so often makes wrong decisions. But I think I know what you mean - after a bad decision goes wrong, he usually tries to weasel out of it by clouding up the issue instead of giving straight answers. I agree that's very annoying.


Your description of my views isn't correct. Although I disagree with govt funding selected restaurants as it currently does, or to replace important highways with parks as quite a few people want to see, or to put art galleries in grain elevators... I do want City Hall to do much more than have a police force. There's a wide gap in between those extremes.


Maybe compared to NY state politicians and most voters here in a state with at or near highest spending-taxing in the U.S., it might sometimes, by comparison... sound like I'm Libertarian, but I'm not that extreme. On social issues I usually agree with Libertarians, but on most other issues I wouldn't go as far as they do. Compared to the status quo, it would be good for NY state and its localities to move in the Libertarian direction. That won't happen (trends are to continue even more govt growth), but if it happened it would make this state and area more similar to other parts of the U.S. and help reduce decline around here. That would make it more likely to find serious economically viable uses for some old buildings with nice arctitecture.


paul>"presenting such ideas gets citizens to think about development issues in new ways to determine their validity"


And that's exactly what happened. Ideas were presented for public feedback, and I commended on how invalid I thought many of them are, especially the 190 removal. Anybody of any age or ideology who advocates removing a heavily used important highway like that in favor of park space deserves criticism, not partonizing pats on the head admiring their creativity.

By "illegal" about 3 plays/year and art galleries in grain elevators, etc., I meant the legally-passed budgets shouldn't ever fund those ideas. Not that anyone should go to jail for it. Maybe sloppy wording on my part. Occasional field trips are fine and the Board of Ed budget can handle that. No need for the regular city budget that the mayor executes to get involved in that.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whatever, I appreciate your comments. You do often come across as more extreme mainly because you tend to hide behind your data rather than expressing your direct opinion, so it's interesting to get a clarification of your views.


We agree on NY State's lack of financial discipline, but I'd trade California's woes for New York's any day. I'd also take New York's situation over Nevada's mess. Their low tax nonsense has revealed how the lack of a social safety net can really hurt. As an example, they cut cancer care in the name of financial discipline and I can't agree with such callousness.


On the I-90, I advocate its removal, but not in favor of parks. I just don't think it retains an importance in the area and vehicular traffic could be routed elsewhere with little consequence. That would re-open neighborhoods again.


On Mayor Brown, yeah, I'll accept he makes wrong decisions. He has no backbone. I'd rather discuss issues with Mr. Ricchiazzi because I would expect more direct answers from him than Mr. Brown. On culture, architecture, and urban planning, you and I remain far apart but I respect your views and your comments. Thanks for the reply.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't drive it daily, but occasionally and I can tell you there's TONS of traffic on the 190 every day at rush hours. Enough to grind traffic to a crawl sometimes even when no accident. I doubt it would be easily routed elsewhere without substantially slowing down 1000s of commuters and trucks every day. That wouldn't be a positive impact for the local economy, not to mention the oppotunity cost of what else all those millions in removal costs could be used for instead.


About the goal of creating more space for new and expanded neighborhoods, I don't know how good much of the space would be. There'd be the Amtrak line near some of it in the west side part. And in the Riverside part and northward to the 290, there's not much demand for new residential space. % vacancy is growing in the existing neighborhoods (in Buffalo anyhow, and I doubt Tonawanda is growing either esp. with the Government Motors engine plant dropping from 3,400 jobs just a few years ago now down to under 700 jobs after this week's announcement of an additional cut). I don't know why anyone would expect new streets to crop up whre the 190 is now. Some data to hide behind (red/purple shaded map at right):
http://fixbuffalo.blogspot.com/2008/09/undeliverable-new-numbers.html

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You mention population declines -- with which I agree -- and yet you justify the transportation network. The highway didn't have a chance for removal in the 1980s -- the last time it was seriously discussed -- because GM threatened to relocate. With so few jobs left there now, GM's argument no longer carries the same weight. The highways are crowded, but they're meant to handle much more traffic. Traffic forces folks to rethink where they live to reduce their commutes. I don't know that anyone in western New York has that concern right now.


If highways were removed, the likelihood of new streets opening up now wouldn't happen; but, planning must happen for the next generations. We bemoan New York's high taxes and poor political climate, but climate changes and diminished water resources have a good chance of pushing many people back to the Great Lakes area from the sunbelt. Visit the Glen Canyon Dam or Hoover Dam and you'll see water levels so low that it's possible they might be forced to cease electrical production. There are many scenarios for population shifts. By that time, NY State might finally get its political house in order, too.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yup. Maybe I am over simplifying things a bit but if a highway system was built to support a population of aprox 500k the same system would not be needed for the present day population of 250k.

In 1994 the highway was closed for an expensive reconstruction project with all of the traffic routed on Niagara st. Im not going to lie, Niagara was packed. But it wasnt packed to the point of undermining the quality of life for commuters as well as the residents. From what I remember from that summer was Niagara looked a lot like Transit rd traffic wise. Conjested and slow? Yes. But not "anti business" slow. The only thing anti business about that reconstruction was the ghastly ammount of taxpayer money that was used to rebuild a road that we didnt need.

The land cleared doesnt need to be used for new housing construction but having it open will make the existing housing more desireable. They could do somthing expensive like re-creating the old canal or somthing cheap like a robert moses pkwy style coversion of the southbound lane for a trail and keeping the northbound lane open for 30mph traffic. The commercial property on Niagara, Grant, Deleware as well as other north-south streets would be worth more as well due to the increase in traffic. Then add the fact that there will no longer be a highway to salt, patrol or re-construct. These factors alone justify 190 removal in my opinion.

As far as GMs bluff on relocating, I dont buy it. Companies dont close gigantic factories over a spat with the locals with a highway. If the local pols had some backbone they could have negotiated a compromise to keep both sides happy. As a govt you dont just bend over for the interests of one company. Besides, now that the company is a ward of the govt this problem may not be brought up if this were proposed today.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Paul>"You mention population declines -- with which I agree -- and yet you justify the transportation network."


Of course, because I'm not simplistic. I also wouldn't recommend foolishly spending many millions of dollars to landbank Elmwood Village or Allentown. Those are in-demand areas.


Probably there are some streets in this area that could be eliminated without negative impact. The 190 isn't one of them. It's an "in demand" highway. Tell me I'm wrong about that. (Btw, how do you know? How many times have you driven on the 190 recently?)


Wasting money to actually decrease the transportation network would make things even worse for the local business environment which is already weak in a lot of ways. Maybe that's why nobody is proposing to remove the 190 except to that so-called fiscal conservative mayoral candidate and a few blog commenters.


Seriously, it's a crazy idea and won't see the light of day. It does illustrate the anti-business mind set of some.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you build a road it will be used. Of course, you'll see heavy traffic at certain times of the day. How many of these vehicles are using the 190 as a pass-through western New York? How many real dollars are generated by trucks that are not departing/arriving in Buffalo? How many manufacturing businesses/jobs have been lost in that area? I agree the cost to dismantle it is high and that is a logical discussion. It means planning.


You think it's a crazy idea, but that does not make it so. Taking down the 190 doesn't mean that business and traffic will cease. Traffic has alternative routes because the entire network of roads was designed for a population twice Buffalo's size. Business adapts. New York's tax and political structure do more to discourage business than any one stretch of asphalt.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Removing the 190 (at least the waterfront section) would not negatively affect local business to any large degree. Most of the traffic on the 190 is commuter related and brings no benefit to our city. The 290 and 90 would serve WNY just as well.
The prime waterfront property know squandered on highways could be put back on the tax rolls and would generate much needed revenue. The neighborhoods bordering the river would become much more desirable and in turn more valuable (more tax revenue).
Please explain how a dirty polluted shortcut for suburban commuters benfits my city or my neighborhood.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If I wasn't so lazy, I'd video the 190's heavy amount of typcial car and truck traffic moving fast and post it on YouTube.


The 190 is very very popular. If it didn't exist, the stimulus might be building it for us.


The pushback from people and businesses against removing it would be tremendous, which is why there's no serious efforts advocating removal. In fact, not long ago a huge number of people worked on a political effort to remove toll booths from the 190, eventually succeding. Even a so-called progressive like Donn Esmonde wrote about the benefit of making the 190 even more productive by removing the toll booths. Back where there were tolls, people waited in lines and paid extra money to drive on it.


The 190 is clearly a very productive, in-demand, pro-business regional asset.


Colin explained it very well above:


"Colin
June 2, 2009 10:10 AM

...

2. It shouldn't be that hard to understand why removing the 190 would be bad for businesses. They use it to move their products and workers as efficiently as possible."


That will have to be the last comment from whatever about this, but it should explain everything pretty well.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

'The 190 is very very popular. If it didn't exist, the stimulus might be building it for us.'


It's used because it's there. I doubt very much that this section of roadway would be built today as it involved tearing up neighborhoods. That wouldn't be popular.


People united to remove toll booths. That's a surprise? Traffic stopped near the toll booths when they were in operation. That's a surprise? Traffic moves better on a roadway with barriers. I don't understand your point.


Yes, goods are being moved on the 190. If it weren't there, those goods would be moved on other roadways in the region. How many of those goods come from Buffalo? Manufacturing has declined dramatically in western New York. However, Buffalo remains a transit point between the largest manufacturing region in Canada to points south of Buffalo. Buffalo serves as a pass-through for a large percentage of those vehicles. That's not much of an economic benefit.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


Whatever - You're projecting quite a few unfounded assumptions onto many of my proposals. Additionally, the difference between a Democrat and a Republican is all in the implementation, not in the vision. Both Democrats and Republicans want to improve our economic and socio-spatial realities, while we would employ different strategies to bring those visions into fruition. Feel free to contact me at matthew.ricchiazzi@changebuffalo.org if you'd like to sit down and talk more deeply about these proposals, implementation strategies, and potential financing models. I have a deep knowledge of economics, planning, structured finance, and lobbying strategy at the federal level; it's sometimes difficult to fully convey my strategic thinking (regarding the implementation and financing stages) in the context of an interview. I'd be happy to sit down with you so that you can engage more than a simply superficial analysis of these policy proposals.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why not elaborate on your platform and continue the discussion. You typically take the discussion off line if you have something uncomfortable to say or something to hide. Some people have some really good comments about your ideas, you can grow from them or run from them. It sounds to me like you are running.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I bet this guy bets Kearns.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

turns out this guy is a typical scumbag who sends out bigoted anti gay propaganda to influence voters.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's never too late...I just saw the mailer that Matthew mailed out. It is disgusting, bigoted, trash. Be careful about bringing this guy in on your projects. His name has been swirling around some historic preservation projects recently.[http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/09/ny_pol_knocks_g.php]

replied to Mike Santoro
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are you a homophobe? I see three sentences and an image. Which do you find disgusting?

replied to MEG
Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The part just under gay porn images that says, "Make sure your son says, 'Thank you, Mark Grisanti'" is the one I find disgusting. It's not the gay porn I find disgusting; it's the fairly obvious attempt to use those images to incite the anti-gay crowd. Ricchiazzi's flyer reinforces the incorrect belief that gay marriage is about sex. As with any marriage, gay or straight, sex is an important part, but just one part. Putting the focus of the gay marriage issue on gay sex between two gay porn stars is wrong. And perhaps especially wrong for Ricchiazzi considering he came out as bisexual in a public letter announcing the end of his campaign, making his claim to plausible deniability based on ignorance of LGBT issues awfully weak. Your son, and all of us, SHOULD say, "Thank you, Mark Grisanti" for risking his political career to stand up for equality, because it was the right thing to do. While Ricchiazzi, a member of the LGBT community, has proven himself to be a little rat who will change sides to play up to whoever will listen. Oh the irony is rich!

Check it out for yourself:
http://www.queerty.com/creepy-one-man-committee-tries-to-smear-pro-gay-buffalo-politician-with-porn-mailer-20120911/

replied to benfranklin
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I didn't find it offensive. It seems like those on the left desire certain outcomes, but don't like to have the specific behaviors pointed out. We're encouraging this with our votes. We also encourage more people to be on food stamps, etc. Is that so bad?

replied to NBuffguy
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You're entitled to your opinion. But I tend to agree with what Alan Bedenko said about the flyer in his September 12, 2012 ArtVoice piece:

"It’s not persuasive, it’s not pithy, it’s not funny, it’s not anything except an opportunity for Ricchiazzi to inflame homophobia. Now recall that all of this stems from the Grisanti camp’s refusal to give Ricchiazzi a job.

Think about how pathetic this is: a kid who’s gay or bisexual is so upset over not getting a job that he’s spent the better part of the last year spreading lies about Grisanti’s behavior during that bar fight in the Falls, he’s developing idiotic political literature attacking Grisanti and his aides, and he develops the homoerotic piece of literature shown above for the sole purpose of getting conservative-minded opponents of same-sex marriage angry. He is so self-loathing, so opportunistic that he chooses to inflame anti-homosexual passions."

As far as your perception that some people don't like "specific behaviors pointed out," well, that's partially true. I don't like gay sex portrayed in political ads...because I don't like sex of any kind portrayed in political ads. It's inappropriate and beyond the boundaries of good taste. Gay people don't owe it to you to be overtly sexual in public just to prove to you that they're not ashamed of their sexuality.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was also disturbed when I found it. The ad is about as low as it gets. Ricchiazzi is very young and probably a over confident still and its really too bad for him that this flyer is now at the top of a google search of his name.

replied to MEG
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment