City March 20, 2009 5:30 PM

A 'Must Read' For WNY Art Enthusiasts

A ‘Must Read’ For WNY Art Enthusiasts
The following is the acceptance speech by Artvoice Publisher Jamie Moses from today's 23rd Annual Arts Awards Luncheon. The speech is presented in its entirety and is a 'Must Read' for anyone who cares about the state of the arts in the WNY region:

Thank you to the Arts Council for this award, but mostly thank you to the Artvoice staff. Unfortunately, for you I woke up at six this morning and wrote down some remarks I want to share with you.

Although I was born here, I grew up in Greenwich Village, a small neighborhood that was home to people like Thomas Paine, Henry James, Walt Whitman, Pollock, Mailer, DiNiro, Dylan, Eugene O'Neil and hundreds more. Including Jane Jacobs, whose book The Death and Life of Great American Cities, possibly the most influential book in America on city planning, was inspired directly from her life in Greenwich Village, which she frequently cited as an example of a vibrant urban community. The heart of that community is its arts and creative people and that's the environment I grew up in.

Artvoice began 19 years ago because when I came here I saw a beautiful city with an incredible population of talented artists, actors, musicians, and writers, but I also saw a shocking lack of appreciation for these creative people. And I saw all the media in town following the lead of The Buffalo News. Maybe that wouldn't be bad if The Buffalo News were a different paper than it is.

Let me give you an example. New York City has nine major league sports teams, football, baseball, basketball, soccer and hockey teams. Yesterday's New York Times had two entire sections devoted to the arts. Buried in the back of the business section were three pages for sports. Yesterday's Buffalo News had ten pages of sports filled with sports columnists pontificating about nothing. Why is that? Buffalo only has two teams and one team isn't even playing now. The Sabres play forty games downtown, which is excellent for the city. Now I don't want to offend any Bills fans, but the Bills only play eight games here in entire year. Seventy thousand people sit in a parking lot in Orchard Park all morning, watch a game and drive home. For the impact the Bills have on this community they might as well be in New Hampshire. Yet they get tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer funded lease deals, free sheriff's patrols, infrastructure improvements and maintenance and they receive endless local media coverage. Why isn't this kind of attention and funding given to our creative people who live and work in the city and produce something for us daily? Is it because we don't believe art has economic power?

Consider that the Bills, host eight sold out stadium games here in a season. Okay, that's impressive, but five musicians in their sixties, The Rolling Stones, in a single worldwide tour sold out 149 stadiums and arenas. Art is economic muscle.

Mamma Mia has grossed over $2 billion; Phantom of the Opera over $5 billion. Buffalo born choreographer Michael Bennett, went to New York, won seven Tony Awards, and his show A Chorus Line chorus ran for 15 years on Broadway and is still touring today, thirty-three years after it opened. But these artists had support. Jackson Pollock and other artists were supported by Roosevelt's WPA program and now the Albright-Knox Art is holding a priceless collection of their work.

Santa Fe has a population of 62,000. It has 250 art galleries, a million tourists, and in cash sales that tiny city is the second-largest art market in the nation, following New York. Its whole economy is driven by the arts and cultural tourism. The people in Santa Fe take art seriously.

But for some reason here in Buffalo creative people are starved, starved for media attention and starved for funding, because our leaders the local media refuse to take art seriously. The county executive isn't even here, and Mayor Brown walked out forty minutes ago. What does that tell you? The county has cut funding for the arts and there's no city funding at all. Yet there's money for the Bills and money for street and highway projects.

When I was a teenager there was fight over a plan to destroy the Soho neighborhood for a ten-lane Manhattan Expressway. Business leaders, politicians and construction unions were all for it. Jane Jacobs led artists and residents, in a fight that successfully beat back Robert Moses, David Rockefeller and host of other powerful people. Today, instead of a ten-lane highway, Soho is listed as a "must see" in every NYC tourist guide published. Do a Google search for Soho and search for restaurants, clothing stores or art galleries and you'll see the map for that small neighborhood dotted with businesses as thick as raspberry jam, including Bloomingdale's, Barney's, Guess, Banana Republic, Apple Computer, and dozens of galleries. But who was there first and who created the attraction? The creative people.

If you want economic development you need to support creative people and let them loose, because if you don't you will safely do the same thing year after year, which is nothing. Or you will safely do what our leaders have done here for the past fifty years, which is ignore the best interests of the community and endlessly chase money by mimicking what someone else, somewhere else did yesterday that got them a dollar. But that was yesterday and that dollar is gone and so we're always behind and operating on a formal policy of a day late and a dollar short.

We need fresh ideas and you're not going to find them in The Buffalo News. Recently, publisher Stan Lipsey bemoaned the fact that The News, which is used to making profits of $35 to $50 million, only earned $19 million last year. "We cannot have red ink at The Buffalo News" he said. So The News is shrinking its work force and cutting budgets in all departments because Stan Lipsey is out of ideas. News editor Margaret Sullivan said, the paper needs to focus on information that isn't available elsewhere, such as high school sports coverage. "I think that's the key to our survival." High school sports, clearly Margaret Sullivan is out of ideas, too. When Lipsey says we cannot have red ink, he's saying Warren Buffet will not lose money and The News will close if it isn't profitable. That would be terrible. We need Warren Buffet to hire a new publisher and a new editor and get some new ideas.

Now in spite of what I've said of the economic value of the arts it would be a mistake to only see money as a justification for supporting art. When you watch a ballet dancer move like a weightless feather gliding in air, you stop and you think, "That's beautiful." And for that one moment the recognition of beauty has entered your breast, it went past the mortgage and the car payments, the death in your family and it touched you. It could be a dancer, it could be Willy Loman in Death of a Salesman or Yo Yo Ma playing cello that brings that moment of beauty. But that moment is more valuable than the Gucci bag on your lap or the custom made suit you wore to the theatre. It can inspire you, comfort you, make you think and give you strength to go forward, even at death's door-like the urging words of poet Dylan Thomas,

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

This week's cover story in Artvoice is about a $74 million windfall in unrestricted federal money coming to the county. What are we going to do with that money? We can't let it fall into the same old hands of people pushing the same tired ideas of the past fifty years. We shouldn't squander it in a negligible tax reduction. I call on the county executive to find a way to support the arts with some of that money and to find fresh ways to use the rest. A fresh idea can happen in an instant and can change everything. When Governor DeWitt Clinton made up his mind to build the Erie Canal and in that one instant he changed the future of Buffalo. That's the power of an idea. Let's support the people with the ideas.

Thank you
View image

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://www.buffalorising.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/978

Idea of the Day from Buffalo Rising on March 21, 2009 10:16 AM

Consider this -- In her article about local artist Shasto O'Leary Soudant, Monaco relates the following suggestion:  One of her ideas to invigorate the Queen City is to raffle off all of Buffalo's unclaimed properties to artists nationwide. "There wou... Read More

Comments

Leave a comment

It had to be said. Unfortunately, the political class in Buffalo doesn't listen to issues regarding the arts. The political scene in Buffalo remains stagnant and bereft of any creative thought. As far as The Buffalo News, well, the paper is acting as if it's on a death march.


Buffalo needs creative arts solutions like Houston's Project Row.

http://projectrowhouses.org/


In addition, advertise and encourage artists to take over run-down houses for $1 and dismiss the idea of shovel-ready land in the city. There's already too much of it with no plans for future use.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Even the fact that we refer, just now, PaulBuffalo, to another project seems stale and already done. Houston has Project Row. Buffalo won't be any better with another city's crown.

I strongly agree with Ms. Moses. Buffalo thinks in the past, complains about the future, and doesn't do a damn thing to come up with an original, worthwile idea.

Once in a while the Times comes out with a cover article, "why MFA is the new MBA." It's because the creative class sees problems with different perspective.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

DietSoda, Buffalo does require its own creative solutions, but providing a live/work environment for artists never gets stale.

replied to DietSoda
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree.
SOHO, Greenwich Village, and now the Lower East Side (as well as Williamsburg and RedHook) in New York, though, have been successful encouraging artists to act as entrepreneurs. Artists invent their own surroundings, which is stimulating independently.

Communities of artists, in my opinion, are best when they are made out of materials discovered, not given. This is not to say money for the arts will ever be discovered in the city, but buildings and markets and whatnot can certainly be!

Jane Jacobs argues mixed use as one of the tenets of community building; arts should find a way to fit into business, retail, and dining--in our case, as a live-work environment. (Artspace ie.) I wouldn't be too happy, if I were an artist, to graduate Parsons and find Buffalo with just a few colonies, no budget for arts...

and that looks like it'll be the case.

Yikes I need to organize my argument.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A seriously righteous speech, Mr. Moses. If you made anyone squirm, they deserved it. Consider this the standing ovation you would have gotten if I was there.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Does Moses think peddling smut ads is helping the local Arts community? I love flipping through the usual one 'think' piece in Artvoice railing against business, seeing the tired news of the weird syndicated junk, and laying my eyes on the 'massage' ads that power the Artvoice revenue engine.

As I understand it from an old Buffalo News article (which I know Mr. Moses doesn't like as a publication) some of those 'rub and tug' joints Artvoice so happily promotes may have some involuntary employees shuttled to the country.

Is that really deserving of an award?

If that's what the local arts scene celebrates, I'd prefer all my tax dollars go to the Bills.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

^^ Says the commenter with the whoremonger moniker.

replied to Eliot Spitzer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

exactly, i should know.

replied to sonyactivision
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm fascinated by Moses comparison between the NYT and the Buffalo News. As far as I know, both are for-profit entities, as is Artvoice. The NYT lost $58M in 2008 while the Buffalo News made $19M. But Moses bemoans the News' management and focus and seemingly praises the NYT extensive arts coverage (and absence of sports coverage). Now, if I were a shareholder, I'd much prefer how the Buffalo News operates than how the NYT does business. Indeed, one could view the profitability of a media company as a signal for whether the entity is delivering quality content to its target market - the Buffalo News is, the NYT isn't.

Now, Moses might actually wish Buffalo was a different place. He may wish that the people here cared more about arts than sports - that there were arts call-in shows on AM radio rather than sports call-in shows - but in lashing out at the News, he's blaming the mirror for the reflection. Kind of silly.

Plus, if you're going to go all holier than thou on your competitor and the derth of arts coverage, maybe you could forsake the adult ads in your own publication and use the pages to cover the dynamic Buffalo arts scene. I suspect that won't happen because like the Buffalo News, Moses cares about the profits of his paper (although the News wouldn't sink to the levels of publishing those ads). The hypocrisy and absurdity of Moses' comments is remarkable.

Where is Matt Taibbi when you need him.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

'Indeed, one could view the profitability of a media company as a signal for whether the entity is delivering quality content to its target market - the Buffalo News is, the NYT isn't.'

You're kidding, right?

replied to Cardiff Giant
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The News has highest penetration rate of almost any newspaper in country and the NYT subscriptions are falling at the fastest rate of almost any newspaper in country.

The News makes money, the NYT loses money.

I'd suggest that implies the News' audience is happy with the product while the NYT's audience is not quite as happy with the product.


How do you read it differently?

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thank you Jaimie. Thank you Buffalo Rising.


I don't think the conclusion by "Cardiff Giant" that the local media simply mirrors what Buffalonians want is accurate. I can easily believe that what is forced on people is what people "become" interested in. And competitive sports is forced on people at a young age.


Compare the school's sports budgets with their arts budgets. Look at the land purchased for school's sports fields compared to the real estate devoted to the arts. Not that physical education is unimportant - good athleticism and competitive sports are not necessarily the same thing.


I have read so often how students participating in intermural sports learn so much that will be valuable in their life. I don't really see fine character developing from competitive high school sports programs - rather I see outlandish behavior by the star athletes continuing in college sports and professional sports.


Of course we can have both. But we should not be taxing citizens so heavily to promote sports for the benefit of spoiled millionaire participants and team owners and let it continue that artists should be "starving".


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Target markets do not reward a company with profitability if it provides quality content. They reward it with revenue if they value the company's product.
There hasn't been competition for Buffalo News in nearly half a century. Even as the Times is battling a shift from paper to internet--it has younger readers, more intelligent ones (check the reading level in the Times versus BufNews) and a much greater overhead--it faces competition form the Sun and other national newpapers. Heck, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer just went completely web! This means ITS target market has a some propensity to read online, ditching the traditional paradigm altogether, and skewing your view of profit-equals-quality. The PI didn't make much profit, but was the quality poor?

Sometimes I have to ask myself if the Buffalo News has provided "quality content." Never do I for the Times.

Moses does neglect to mention that Buffalonians may value sports more than art, being a blue-collar, low income, education-lax, aging, city.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Cardiff, the Buffalo News has an old captive audience that is happy to read any local paper. (If you took the obituaries out the News, though, I bet many older folks would cancel their subscriptions.) Once these folks pass on, the Buffalo News has a big problem. They have done nothing to transition to a new, younger audience. In addition, they are letting their talented people depart. (If the Buffalo News cannot adequately cover the details of the Wingate Hotel story -- an issue that can have rippling effects for waterfront development -- then the News is not serving the local community interests.)


The NY Times got in trouble when they built their new $250M corporate headquarters on Eighth Avenue. If they can get through the recession and balance their debt load, then they certainly have the talent to forge ahead. All newspapers face the print versus web debate, though.


Keep in mind, too, that Buffalo is a one-newspaper town. New York City still has a number of local newspapers, plus free papers that are passed out on the streets of Manhattan. If NYC were reduced to a one-newspaper town, the subscriber penetration would rise significantly.


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No, the NYT didn't get in trouble when they 'built' their headquarters though they did just use that building to rescue some liquidity with a leaseback deal. They made money in 2007 but lost a lot in 2008, unlike the always profitable Buffalo News. And again, that wasn't because of an intervening real estate deal.

Here's a link to their full year financials. As you'll see, their 2008 loss was a result of dramatically reduced revenue which outpaced the DECLINE in costs. Real estate wasn't a new cost factor which drove the lack of profitability.

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=105317&p=irol-pressArticle&ID=1249232&highlight

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Cardiff, yes, the NY Times used their building as collateral. Carlos Slim Helu provided a substantial loan to them, too. As I said earlier, if they can manage through the recession -- and that is a daunting challenge facing every newspaper -- they'll have the resources to forge ahead. As you can see in their financials, they own/manage more than the NY Times itself and that gives them marketable assets. Unless Warren Buffett is ready to throw money into the Buffalo News to prepare it for the 21st century, the News really doesn't act like an entity that has a game plan to survive.


I could say more, but so many folks above were more eloquent than I on this topic.

replied to Cardiff Giant
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well said.

However Jane Jacobs book is not one of the most influential books on American urban planning. It unfortunately is among the least influential.


Someone please mail this to the mayor and county exec.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think many of us may take Artvoice for granted. But we shouldn't. Artvoice has published some very challenging discussions over the last 15 years as well as consistently interesting and inclusive coverage of the arts. Jamie has earned his rant against the boring local daily status quo and hurrah for him.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Artvoice has tackled many not so popular issues over the years, I rather like it. The Buffalo News pales in comparison to the Times. It is a small town useless paper read by an ageing population that will probably fold well before the Times.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I always thought Artvoice was a political forum for bashing republicans, was it really intended to be about promoting the Arts? This guy is a joke, just go back to any AV issue and look at the critic reviews of plays or movies… 90 percent of the time it is negative and condescending. Thank God for Buffalo Rising!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lastly, if Artvoice charged for the paper like the Buffalo news, would anyone really buy it? My guess is that most people use Artvoice as a placemat for their midnight tacos at Jim's and ETS. ...though regardless of what we all say here, print media is slowly dying off everywhere.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I completely disagree...AV is good for something else as well,i use it to start fires. My wood was so wet this year i needed like 4 or 5 just to get the thing lit. Thanks Jamie.

replied to Brandon S.
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Norwood! You get back in your cage RIGHT NOW! Sorry, people, she figured out hot to open the lock somehow.

replied to Scott Norwood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"If you want economic development you need to support creative people and let them loose, because if you don't you will safely do the same thing year after year, which is nothing"


Seriously, it takes a lot more than artists and creative people to stimulate economic development in Buffalo. I liked the article but found it profoundly biased and one sided, but what should I expect from an art lover preaching to others like him. Would I expect him to discuss business, or even understand business development? Would I expect him to understand the attraction of sports and the true impact on the area? Probably expecting too much from a guy who feels that we cannot have art and sports in the same city. The art suffers at the hands of professional sports. I listened to the speech and it sounds so myopic and narrow minded. He sounds like he is trying to rally the marching band to take on the jocks.


We love to celebrate our 'blue collar' heritage, our undereducated yet down to earth working class who appreciate the finer points of a good six pack of Gennie Cream. The same common joes and janes who have been shut out of the arts community in Buffalo, the ones that feel that they are not educated enough to truly grasp the significance of artwork at the AKAG or to truly enjoy a play at Shakespeare in the Park. We have a very snobbish arts community in Buffalo, and they turn-off more people than they bring in. Can you sense the pretentiousness in his speech? Is that going to win over the majority of Buffalonians? Will they really even go to a ballet if they are concerned with their mortgage payment, their job security, the health of their family, etc?


I love the arts, I am on my 12th year of season tickets to Shea's and was there tonight for the Wizard of Oz. I am at UBCPA almost every other week to see something worthwhile, and I attend many other performances, openings, and shows throughout the year. I do what I can to support the arts through private donations, attending events, getting involved, etc. That said, I know how pretentious and stand-offish we truly are. We are less interested in arts for the common man than we are in art for our own selfish interests. We want the opera and the ballet over football and hockey; however we have yet to convincingly sell the beauty of the ballet or the magnificence of the opera to the majority of Buffalonians, who understand the nuance of the game and the finer points of athleticism to a degree that few in attendance at today's event would ever be able to grasp. After all, people like Jamie Moses are too far above the rest to be caught spending the morning tailgating in Orchard Park and the rest of the day surrounded by 80,000 screaming fans.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Cardiff Giant I don't see what you're so puzzled about. As someone pointed out the NYT lost money because they invested a quarter billion dollars in their future and growing the company. With more than 20 million visitors they have the largest newspaper website in the world, ten million ahead of second place USA Today. They have a print circulation of 1.65 million and they have a deep pool of talent and are digging in for what's ahead.

The Buffalo News circulation is dropping faster than the NYT. A few years ago the News daily circulation was 325,000. It's now 175,000 and falling, and they are laying people off, printing a smaller paper and charging 33% more for it with the recent 25 cent raise. Is that strategy supposed to increase readership? If this is what you want to invest in as a shareholder then you are shortsighted because unless they change, as Moses suggested, they are going down. But since they are so obsessed with profit margins that's unlikely. Unlike the NYT or Artvoice, the Buffalo News is only about the business and as Moses predicts when the first day arrives that there is no profit you'll see how much they cared about Buffalo. They'll shut the doors before they'll lose money.
I think Moses point was that the News has had a captive audience since the Courier folded and they squandered it with lazy editorial decisions, "the hell with the people, just give them more sports writers and they'll be happy." And the other media followed suit, radio, etc. But according to several studies in hand at the Arts Council, UB and other places, more people attend arts events here than sporting events.

As far as the "adult" ads in Artvoice, what are you a virgin who's offended by the thought of intimacy? Adults can meet and get together however, that's why they call them adults.


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Aces - so the News will close when it starts losing money because it doesn't 'care' about Buffalo? Did any suggest they do 'care' about Buffalo and/or should stay open when they are a money-losing operation? Your comments make no sense.

Indeed, do any of the media outlets around here 'care' about Buffalo? Will any stay around if they are losing money consistently? Of course not.

What point are you trying to make?

If these studies suggest more people attend art events than sporting events, some media outlet should be able to profit by targeting that population. How about you start a new media company and have at it?

Also, I'm not a virgin and we all love adult content, but to say that "adults can get and meet together however" you intentionally neglect the fact that it appears many of the women on the business end of the 'massage' sessions provided on Niagara Falls Boulevard aren't there voluntarily. It's called the sex trade business. Google it. Then tell me if you'd profit from it. If so, target those places as advertisers for your new arts-focused media company.

replied to aces
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The point Cardiff Giant is that the NYT is willing to go into debt to invest in the future and is confident it has a strategy to get out of that debt. That is a risk the Buffalo news wouldn't take.

And how did you know the massage parlors were on Niagara Falls Blvd.? I didn't know that!


replied to Cardiff Giant
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

the NYT is going into debt because it has no liquidity. Without money, you can't run a business, hence the need to borrow from a Mexican billionaire. I have no idea - nor do you - whether the News would or wouldn't go into debt, but lucky for them, they've run a tight enough ship where they actually have cash on hand to run the business so they don't need to make that choice. Unlike the NYT.

And I know about the parlors because a) it was reported in the News b) their ads direct you there and c) I go there 3x a month.

replied to aces
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh, I get it. The NYT invested a quarter billion in a new building, has correspondents all over the world, is developing the newspaper industry's best full media site and consistently comes out with breaking stories is experiencing a liquidity problem. Whereas the Buffalo News, digs for stories at the currently empty Ralph Wilson Stadium but still manages to make money from Rosa's inserts and full page ads from West-Herr auto dealers. Therefore, the Buffalo News is a better paper. Got it!

replied to Cardiff Giant
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Aces - you successfully argued against the straw man position that no one once said - that the Buffalo News is a 'better paper' than the NYT. The News is simply a better business as evidenced by their profits compared to the NYT's losses. It's very simple really.

And boy, you're real in to this NYT 'investment' in their headquarters as if that transaction was either smart or meaningful to someone. I'm certain you don't understand this, but they just had to sell the building and arrange a leaseback deal so they've now fully 'disinvested' from that building. Instead of owning, they now pay a cool $25M in annual rent. They did this because their debt burden was too much to handle. So on top of the loan from Carlos Slim, they raised $225M by selling their new headquarters. Got it?

And let me guess, you're full name is Jamie Aces Moses.

replied to aces
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok boys, recess is over. The NYT Building was well over $1 billion to construct and it was a joint venture with Forest City Ratner. The NYT simply sold a portion of their 58% interest in the tower. They had to because they got overleveraged putting the damn tower up and spending a bundle on cable TV and other media. What really burned them was when cost of fuel spiked and drove up all their other costs. Their business model predicted no deep recession and for the last 5 years, their ad revenue soared. Now all that has changed and they have a $400 million note due in May and another $700 million note due next year. The Carlos Slim deal was a white knight equity swap designed to scare away, guess who? Rupert Murdoch, who badly wants the Times hanging on his trophy wall right next to the WSJ. The Sulzbergers would rather whore themselves on a dimly lit Jersey City street and later resell the crack than let Rupert Murdoch get his grubby claws on the family jewels. And while the Buffalo News is owned by a similar 'white knight', Warren Buffett, they still have to run as fast as they can to remain profitable because Buffett has no patience for losses and cutting the Buffalo News loose would essentially destroy its value to any other investor. To stay in the Berkshire fold, they have to cut, and chop, and whittle away until all they are is a wrapper for crappy massage parlor ads. Think The Pennysaver with a wire service editorial page.

replied to Cardiff Giant
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

sony - a correction. revenue hasn't soared at NYT over past 5 years. 2008 revs were lower than 2007. 2007 revs were lower than 2006. Oh, and the NYT lost $543M in 06, made $208M in 07, and then lost another $58M in 08. In no annual report have they ever referenced fuel costs so don't know where you're getting that information.

Now carry on.

I'm heading back to watch more Fox news.

replied to sonyactivision
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I stand corrected, Mr. um, Giant. Odd though that the NYT hasn't cited their energy costs in their annual reporting because that's a lamentation I've seen from them in various articles about their industry. Perhaps they buried the bad news as "fixed costs". Who knows? But their ad revenue did indeed soar right through the elections, even as their margins declined. One thing about those elections was the extensive real estate they devoted to all those stories from the primaries on through. Had the whole process been a sleeper, I bet they could have saved some serious money. I haven't read their 10k to see what else is driving them to ruin but I might since you piqued my curiosity ;)

replied to Cardiff Giant
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Moses has his facts wrong. Thursday's NYT had the same number of regular sports pages as that day's BN, 4 and a half. Not 10 vs. 3 as he claimed.

The BN that day had 4 extra sports pages for annual preview of the NCAA basketball tourney. Counting those, it was 8 and a half. And he refers to the NYT having two arts sections. One was a 1-time section about museums. On a typical Thrus, it has one arts section.

On an average day, the BN and NYT have a remarkably close number of sports pages - usually 3 or 4 each.

Even aside from having that wrong, it was a dumb rant because it ignores that there's four daily papers in the NYC area. The other three cover sports even more than the NYT and none of those have much arts coverage.

His description of the Buffalo Bills subsidy money looks overstated too. If he's saying all pro sports subsidies should end, I'd agree. I don't want to see any government aid for sports or arts when there's so many other more serious needs. Let people and businesses support sports or arts voluntarily as they choose.

If ticket surcharges and parking fees can fully fund county spending for security and stadium/arena upkeep, then that's ok, but no more general tax money for either the Bills or Sabres after the current leases end, and ideally none for arts or theaters either.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Who reads The NYT sports section? Seriously? It's a news and business daily. The arts coverage varies and indeed has a lot of local competition from Time Out to the New York Magazine website. With R.W.Apple gone and Frank Rich retired to the editorial pages, it's all Michael Kimmelman and Nicolai Ouroussoff holding the thing up. The sports section is actually fun because they go where many others wouldn't bother and sometimes unearth the quirkier side of sports but even USA Today runs rings around their regular coverage. The BN is about what you'd expect from an embattled midmarket daily: a few column inches of Local in a sea of boring wire.

And prepare for a shock: I totally agree with you about government getting out of the arts business. Not because I hate the Arts but because the Arts are so often dulled by the petty rivalries and political feudalism that government arts funding creates. The Arts are one area where the free market's darwinian tendencies actually have done humanity a favor by weeding out the mediocre garbage. You get greatness and of course, plenty of Paris Hilton.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

To answer your first question, evidently Jamie Moses reads the NYT sports section at least enough to count its pages Thursday, even if he didn't count its pages accurately. In his defense, his comment says he looked at it only quickly that day.

And yeah, sony, I am surprised you agree with me that we should have a separation of arts and state. Your reasons are good points too.

In that spirit, we should praise Chris Collins for not attending the arts luncheon. If he'd been there, many of those special interest advocates would've begged him for more of our tax money. He might have caved in and agreed to it just to get them to be quiet.

The Buffalo Bills subsidy in recent county budgets is now well less than the "tens of millions" that Moses claims it is. But it should be reduced to zero as soon as the current lease agreement ends, so in principle I agree with Moses in opposing taxpayer money for pro sports.

replied to sonyactivision
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mr. Moses has earned the respect he enjoys in Buffalo; his vision and hard work with Artvoice have been remarkable. But this is a disappointing and recklessly argued speech, which peddles cliches and misleading arguments that blow stale air into already tired assumptions about Buffalo.


The NY Times arts section is largely ignored by the metro population of New York City, except to check movie listings and theater times for bloated Broadway shows. There are other print media for NYC sports fans, and their passion for sports is equal to or greater than what we see in Buffalo. Buffalo has no other source in print for sports. Is it really surprising that the Buffalo News, the only full service newspaper in town, has such depth to its coverage? And why ever do people compare any city in this country to New York, which is not a city but a citystate of leviathan scale? What should disturb us more than the Buffalo News sports fever is the appalling writing in the NY Times. The most hackneyed writing of all spills into their irrelevant and sycophantic arts section.


But Mr. Moses' fawning reference to Sante Fe--that tourist-trap of affluent retiree and celebrity second-homes and an unbearably self-conscious "creative" class and its smug souvenirs--simply insults the long pedigree and superior contribution of Buffalo to high culture. It may surprise Mr. Moses that the Buffalo citizens who support a philarmonic, a major museum, several theatre companies, many rich chamber music series, alternative art installations, Hallwalls, Babeville, small press publishing, one of the best literary scenes in the country, and so many music and film series I can't list them--might object to his implication that citizens of Western New York do not care about the arts. He might want to walk over to the Karpeles tomorrow for the small press fair to see this in action. He might realize that raw self-expression in subsidized tourist traps does not equal art, and that art and culture in Buffalo will go on with or without a tourist economy or newspapers or blogs to massage them.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@EricOak: Bitter much? Santa Fe, for all its past sins of pretension and faux sophistication has actually (gasp!) grown sophisticated. It now regularly attracts global art personae and the ticky-tacky trinkets have been banished to the outer rings of the local scene. But you are right about the retirees: The last time I visited, I thought I was in that scene in "Coccoon" when the space ship lands and all those elderly people come out. Nevertheless, while I'm not sure Buffalo could or should emulate them or anyone else, it never hurts to advertise and it never hurts to pluck a plump goose from time to time.

replied to EricOak
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Eric I think you miss the point. He is not saying Buffalo is an art backwater. He says that the local media treats it like a backwater. He is saying that there is a lack of official support for a portion of the economy potentially far more powerful than professional sports.


By the way the NYT sunday is about half the size it was just a few years ago.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Newell,
Thank you for wanting to post my speech on BRO. However, after reading through the comments I realize that (and for many reasons) it was a mistake to give you a copy of it. I would like to ask that it be removed. The conclusion of the speech was to ask the county to increase support of our cultural institutions by dedicating a portion of the unrestricted $74 million stimulus money coming its way soon. My award was for Advocate of the Arts and that was what I was doing, advocating. It's that simple.

In the context of the subdued mood of the Arts Awards Luncheon my critical remarks about the Buffalo News and our political leadership were well received, particularly when I pointed out that the county executive failed to show up and Mayor Brown stayed ten minutes and walked out. But the speech, hastily written minutes before the event, was not an article and it was not published by Artvoice, nor would it have been. For example, I referenced Thursday's issue of the New York Times and the Buffalo News because I happened to have those two copies of yesterday's paper in my car. That is not how I research an article meant for print, although it was sufficient to supplement my comments because my remarks were general observations that local media devotes an exaggerated amount of time and space to sports, that the economic impact the Buffalo Bills deliver is not deserving of the tens of millions in subsidies they receive, that the Buffalo News could be more innovative instead of continually shrinking its staff and raising its pricing to maintain profitability, and that a vibrant creative class of people are consistently ignored and reduced to beggary when it comes to funding.

This was a speech specific for that normally dry event and if you weren't at the event it would be difficult to appreciate the merit of it. As a printed piece parsed and argued about by visitors to your site, it is inviting all kinds of false conclusions, debates about newspapers, and numerous comments on Artvoice, even though Artvoice didn't publish it and had nothing to do with it, and was never mentioned other than to thank the staff for being there. My role for the past year has been devoted to video work and developing ArtoiceTV.com. I have very little to do with the newspaper.

It's good to see a discussion on the subject of media, arts, etc., but I don't think my luncheon speech is strong enough to be the foundation such discussion is launched from.

jamie

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Or you could read the comments and reflect on what the people of Buffalo are telling you. You made a speech and it was published, you referenced your work at Artvoice and your ideas for the Buffalo News several times during the presentation. The amount of thought or time that you put into the speech is of little consequence now that it is out there. Can President Obama erase his Special Olympics comment? Can George Bush rescind all that he said while he was President? No, they cannot and either can you.


You put yourself and your thoughts out there, maybe the speech wasn't enough to be a foundation of discussion, but the discussion was started from your speech. Why not contribute to it and help others to see a different perspective instead of trying to avoid it. You said these things for a reason, now stand behind your words and convictions instead of running away from them.

replied to Jamie Moses
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You're right, I made the speech and who cares how much time I spent on it. But I don't believe I referenced my work at Artvoice at all (I'm not going to reread the thing to check but I don't see why I would have done that). As far as reflecting on the comments, I have done that and I think some very valid things have been said. But I simply have neither the time, nor any particular inclination, to in spend time on this site in a point by point discussion. And that's not running away. I'm only an occasional visitor here and maybe a couple times in a year I visit some similar discussion site. This format is just not my cup of tea. But one man's ceiling is another man's floor.... carry on.

j.

replied to whynot
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And by the way, just so no one mistakes my comment on this format as some kind of insult, it wasn't. The fact is I'm too slow witted for this format. I can't debate dozens of people at the same time. This is for speed chess players.

replied to whynot
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jamie Moses opines; "And by the way, just so no one mistakes my comment on this format as some kind of insult, it wasn't. The fact is I'm too slow witted for this format. I can't debate dozens of people at the same time. This is for speed chess players."

It ain't chess. We just like playing with the 'table tents'.

replied to Jamie Moses
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

74 million stimulus money for arts? WTF? I love the arts, though if artists actually created art that anyone wanted, then it would sell... When the government gives free money to the artists, it is basically saying that you can be a complete failure and churn out crap that no one wants and still get paid for it... typical... this is why artists don't run the world, or anything for that matter.
.
Maybe we can take some of that 74 million to fill some potholes, shelter the homeless and feed the poor rather that give it to jamie, shasti and their friends!

replied to Jamie Moses
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We should include money for remedial reading classes for you while we're at it Brandon. He said "dedicating a portion of the unrestricted $74 million stimulus money" ... the key word there is portion.

replied to Brandon S.
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jamie,

Don't remove it- I read it like you wrote it- quickly (about every other sentence) It made perfect sense- when will people wake up to the arts over pro sports?- just the report on the mayor & county ex. are to the point.

Artvoice and B Rising are both superior to the News for thought-provoking info. I've also seen the News rip of ideas from B Rising several days later.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes they sold the building in a lease back deal and they expect to be out of the lease and own the building again in a few short years. So what's your point? You said they had a liquidity problem. They're dealing with it. And why do you feel the need to continue mentioning that they borrowed money from a Mexican? Is there something wrong about that? Also, you flatter me by suggesting I'm Jamie Aces Moses, so for that I'll thank you. It would be nice to have accomplished half of his contributions to the city. My biggest claim is trying to be a good dad. You know, to be honest, I don't think I like you. So don't bother addressing me any longer if you can control yourself. Your views are pompous and you sound like a conservative republican. Let me guess, your full name is Cardiff "Carl Paladino" Giant.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Back to the speech - I like the speech and its general tenor. In accepting an award, Mr. Moses made several persuasive arguments about community priorities and more focus and funding for the arts.


I grew up knowing nothing about the arts; spent my time playing sports and wishing I could afford to go to Bills games. At 32 I could finally afford season tickets, and over the past 22 seasons I have missed a total of 6 games - 4 because I was out of town and 2 for my kid's baptisms.


Here is what I have learned - the Bills are important to WNY but they are NOT an economic engine. There is a reason why there has been almost no private investment around Ralph Wilson Stadium since it opened in 1973 - 8 to 10 games a year is simply too little activity to generate any significant spinoff investment. The older I get, the more I realize that the most important thing about the games is the opportunity to spend the day with friends and family, plugging into the community spirit that is present. I suspect a lot of fans feel the same way.


The arts - including historic preservation and cultural tourism - ARE an economic engine for which we as a community are providing too little fuel. We need to change that. Jamie Moses has made important contributions to this dialogue, up to and including this speech. Even if it wasn't perfectly argued, the message still resonates. He should continue to sound the call for more focus and more funding for the arts.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Skarnath - One of the biggest issues with Buffalo and WNY is that there is no real economic engine. Our economy is struggling because we are trying to use oars and paddles to move this ship. We need some true economic development if we want to become a truly viable economy again, until that time we will limp along as we watch the last of the large private employers move away from the area, leaving us to survive on state jobs and government handouts.

replied to skarnath
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jamie should get another award for getting the dolts on this site to actually react to something other than an old fugly crumbling building or a bridge that ain't never going to be built or sports teams that will NEVER win the big prize.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll