City February 6, 2009 8:50 PM

We Screwed Up

We Screwed Up
Since we decided to stop printing our monthly magazine, we thought it made sense to communicate that change to readers.  So we wrote about it here.  We also wanted to communicate this change to former print readers so we designed table tents to place at former print distribution outlets. 

The table tents, which are getting a lot of attention now, read "DON'T READ THESE."  Now, the plan was to have our distributor put these table tents on countertops (near registers, on bars, etc) at heavily trafficked locations.  And by proclaiming "DON'T READ THESE," we meant 'Don't Read These' table tents.  By writing 'don't read these,' we hoped, of course, that people would read these tents.  The tents go on to explain how BuffaloRising.com is a source for information about the city. 

Unfortunately, in some locations, our distributor put these tents on Artvoice magazines, making it seem rather clear that we were encouraging people not to read Artvoice.  Or any of the free print publications that are distributed around town.  That was not the intention, and we apologize to Artvoice for this.  Indeed, we've sourced Artvoice on this site before and as the longest-standing alternative news publication in the area, Artvoice plays a critical role as a watchdog that we can't and don't play. 

As our frequent critic BuffaloPundit points out:

Why would Buffalo Rising be asking its readers not to read Artvoice? Are they even in competition anymore, as far as the race for magazine eyeballs is concerned? There's obviously a place in this world for BRO to exist in the same world as Artvoice, so why start a war with the latter? Why squat your little mini-billboard on Artvoice's property?

Exactly. 

Foolishly, we never thought about the prospect that these tents would be placed on or near other free weekly publications.  Of course, we wouldn't want people to stop reading print publications, nor are we delusional enough to think we could convince them to stop.  In our attempt to get our former print readers' attention and encourage them to follow us online, we, to borrow a phrase from President Obama, screwed up.  

We've directed our distributor to collect all these tents to avoid any more confusion.  Clearly, we should have gone with the other headline option - 'We're Not a Magazine Anymore.' 








 
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Meh, tempest in a table tent.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This isn't "news"- No one cares about your little feuds BRO. Get back to bringing me valuable content. That's why I visit. thanks

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Cardiff Giant, its only because Buffalo Rising pales in comparison to the Beast.

replied to HereWeGo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is Moses going to come swinging a pool cue again? This pales in comparison to the Beast-Artvoice feud.

http://buffalobeast.com/02/moses.htm


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

DISAGREE. This was an entirely appropriate place to make this statement. If you are concerned about inconvenient, unnecessary messages you shouldn't have submitted yours.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This should be a lesson for anyone involved in the communication business -- perhaps two lessons.

First, don't write something you don't mean.

Second, humour is a funny thing. Funny haha, and funny strange.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This apology smells like BS to me. As Pundit points out on his site, if "Don't Read These" is supposed to refer to the tent itself, then why don't they say "Don't Read This" instead? Using the plural "These" makes it seem a lot like they're referring to the multiple free publications that they were "accidentally" placed near.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Regardless of their intention, and I could really care less, this was a brilliant move. Just think of all of the publicity being handed to them. Probably a poor decision by Artvoice to cry over it.

Anywho, since the launch of the new site I've been pretty bored with BR. Maybe seems like there have been fewer and fewer stories? Not sure if its because there just isnt anything going on, but in any case I'd suggest beefing up content in order to hook any of the people lured to the site by reading about this controversy

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with Jamesbflo on this one. The new site is uninspiring and downright boring at times. I used to visit three or four times a day to check in on the comments and opinions more than the fluff stories. Now that most of the interesting commentators have stopped posting, comments have been edited, and the more contrarian opinions have been quelled by the same four or five people and their new urbanist circle jerk, it just isn't that interesting anymore. I rarely visit even once a day anymore and most of my friends have lost interest all together.


I am bored with the references to "rusty chain" beer, and the rock creek village, the cheap renderings of the next designer's dream for Buffalo, and the trips down memory lane that are more about how Buffalo screwed up than they are about what it will take to repair the damage. There are a few comments by our resident leftist democrats who believe that the who problem with the US is that there people who have more money than others and that somehow this is a bad thing because the rich are given their money while the poor are forced to work for it. Something like that anyway.


I think the staff at BRO got a little too drunk on the Rusty Chain beer and let their success get to their heads. The comments of "Newell for Mayor" may have been too much. With Think Financial going under, and the new site being a flop, I wonder how long BRO will be around too. I give them until the summer, then we will see a drop off in advertising and a reduction in articles. It is sad, because you had a great thing going. Too bad someone really screwed up the chemistry when they decided that they could make it better.


Take care BRO readers and staff. Peace!

replied to jamesbflo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"...Now, the plan was to have our distributor put these table tents on countertops (near registers, on bars, etc) at heavily trafficked locations. ... Unfortunately, in some locations, our distributor put these tents on Artvoice magazines, ... Foolishly, we never thought about the prospect that these tents would be placed on or near other free weekly publications. ..."

Why would bars, cafes, or stores want those "tents" taking up space on their counters? As an unpaid favor to Buffalo Rising? That doesn't make sense. The tents seem intended to be put exactly where distributors put them on stacks of free publications. As Colin noted, the sign wording's plural grammar also indicates that intent.

I wonder if this comment on the AV blog is true that Albright Knox withdrew advertising from BR now because their logo was included beneath "Don't Read These!" ?

http://bllogs.artvoice.com/avdaily/2009/02/06/buffalo-rising-reaches-new-low/#comment-4096

Other than the advertiser loss if that happened, I agree with jamesbflo that the whole thing was a smart little publicity getter. Nobody's going to stop reading because of it and it attracted some clicks from readers of other websites.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I love it... hahaha

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sorry, but you finally hung yourself on this one. I give BRO 4 months. I hear the Albright is pissed and I don't blame them. That's a ton of potential revenue loss. This sorry excuse was no help either. May the money behind BRO really needs put a muzzle on Nussbaumer if they want to salvage this concept.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

it is actually boring and very one sided. one can tell by the amount of comments how it is fading. The demise of the shiny sheet proves it is on the way out.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I've got to say that I agree that BRO has become less interesting since the new site launched. Part of it is that certain commenters never came back, but mostly I think it's that there are fewer interesting things to cover. The few topics that do draw a great deal of interest here -- the casino, condo prices, etc. -- have been beaten to death already. So we get a bunch of posts shilling for rock creek whatever, or kissing Dr. Williams' ass.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Visiting a website and then commenting about how bad it sucks is like calling someone up to tell them you don't want to talk to them anymore.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

S**t happens...

BR f'd up...they apologized...move on.

I've been following BR since the days when they had a simple blogspot type blog. Though I have also questioned their direction at times, they along with other blogs add to the local net scene.

I hope they stick around and get back to their original core focus.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well said wnynot.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How is that well said? He is a negative a-hole who *****es and moans about everything. Go check out his last 10 comments and tell me exactly how anything he posts is well-said.


Nothing in life is easier than sitting back and pointing out what is wrong with the world around them. Try doing something to change it.

replied to sambo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well said SN!

replied to Scott Norwood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So WCP and SN, are you saying it's impossible for ideas to be "well said" if they're from a consistently different viewpoint from Buffalo Rising's editorial positions? Only the QE/WCP/Steel/etc. philosophies can possibly be well said?

indabuff - some of the criticism, fair or not, is that their apology wasn't honest. If they just said sorry without that very hard to believe explanation, there'd be less push back. On the other hand, they didn't owe anyone any explanation.

replied to WCPerspective
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No, I was just saying whynot's comment was not "well said."


As for the level of honesty in their explanation, why do you find it so hard to believe? An apology without an explanation isn't much of an apology at all.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why didn't the tents say "don't read this" rather than "don't read these"????

replied to Scott Norwood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ScottNorwood>"No, I was just saying whynot's comment was not "well said."

Huh? Then it was some other Scott Norwood who wrote this? "He is a negative a-hole who *****es and moans about everything."

Kind of a funny definition of "just".

replied to Scott Norwood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ScottNorwood>"why do you find it so hard to believe?"

Answered already in my comment at 7:36 and Colin's at 2:33. Not believable that "don't read these" meant the ad tents (rather than the stack of Artvoices it was placed on). Also not believable that BR seriously thought ad tents would be placed on counters near checkout registers for no reason. Why would any business do that? Neither are believable, let alone both.

As HereWeGo said, it's a blog. BR didn't owe apology or explanation for advertising in an aggressive rude way. It was possibly effective in the end. If they post an explanation even though not owed, and it sounds full of b.s. then they shouldn't be surprised if some comments point that out.

replied to Scott Norwood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What's the problem Scott Norwood, my last 10 negative comments are worse than your last 10 negative comments? Let's see, you *****ed about Kuni stating that their quality has dwindled to crap, you called the OneSunset owners deadbeats, you call the property in the Cobblestone District a "piece of crap" and you *****ed about the quality of produce at Trader Joes, while making other derogatory comments about Wegmans. This is only a sampling of the negative comments that you make. Let's see who is the ******* here who *****es and moans about everything. Your a f***king douche.


No go f**k off you self-righteous and pretentious prick!


replied to Scott Norwood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I believe it's "You're a f***king douche." But anyway- it's a blog. Relax. Take a deep breath. Go outside or something.

replied to whynot
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well I said it because he did say it well.

"Nothing in life is easier than sitting back and pointing out what is wrong with the world around them."

Funny you should mention that, on BRO I have read a lot of comments from "Monday Morning Quarterbacks". We all do it so don't think your above it Norwood. Your not.

replied to Scott Norwood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ohhh. TY, lou, fr gv me ntr topcon!

I know what "table tents" means! That gives me, an olderly person, a brd nw topcon! Again, ty...


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ohhh. TY, lou, fr gv me ntr topcon!

I know what "table tents" means! That gives me, an olderly person, a brd nw topcon! Again, ty...


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Heck, for comparative reasons, many totally stopped paying homage to the O'Reilly Factor.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

When a Web site/blog becomes tooo relatively IDed with O'Reilly's kind of selfFactoring, many lose interest.

When the public insisted, Bill O had to (someswhat) clean up his act.

Local bloggers, whose horns sound a different toot, don't.
(And they don't get votes either.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll